Reading: pp. 76-89 (Selected: pp. 76-82)
1. Thesis
God is one substance, and is entirely different from man. As a result of this, God cannot be described at all by man.
2. Terms
A. God: The Abrahamic God, as described in the Old Testament.
B. Essence: The nature of a thing that constitute what it means to be that thing.
C. Attribute: A characteristic pertaining to the sum of a things essence.
D. Quality: An accidental property not necessary to the things essence.
E. Action: Effect through material cause.
Propositions
A. Definition cannot be used to describe God.
B. Quality cannot be used to describe God.
C. Analogy cannot be used to describe God.
D. Action cannot be used to describe God.
Arguments
Argument for Proposition A: Definitions are an explanation of a thing. Explanations necessitate a previous cause. God does not have a previous cause as he is the cause of himself. Therefore, God cannot be defined and consequently cannot be described through the use of a definition.
Argument for Proposition B: Since qualities do not pertain to the essence of a thing, they are inherently accidental. Accidental properties or “qualities” are only applicable to finite things. God is infinite; therefore, God does not possess any qualities.
…show more content…
His last two however are not, the fourth just rambles on about how different God is from everything else. Although God may be profoundly different from man, man was derived from God’s essence. Based on this, it seems intuitive to think that man would be able to offer at least broad descriptions of God. The fifth makes a claim that God’s effects are somehow different from all other effects because they emanate from his essence. I probably just don’t fully understand the fifth, but it doesn’t seem clear why his effects emanating from his essence as opposed to “any extraneous thing” prevents man from understanding him through his
For what is in a state of actuality cannot cause something that is potential to reach a state of actuality of greater power than its own. This would mean that God is the summation of all things that are actual and potential in the universe. From this, we can observe that humans and their intellect are reflections of God for our intellect would have to at one point been in a state of potentiality, and Gods actuality (in this case his intelligence) would have to had set our potential intelligence into a state of actuality. Therefore, God is
I was exposed to religion as a child but it didn’t really truly connect with me at first. I have grown up catholic because that is the way my family preaches. I was taught to know to always go to church on Sunday’s and holy days of obligation, if you sin deeply you need to go to confess and the list goes on. Although, as I got older I began the true meaning of God being the greatest being and I started to have my very own religious experiences which raised a lot of questions in me. This now brings me to the argument that I’m going to talk about, The ontological argument.
3. Out of all three arguments for the existence only one of them is based on an a priori knowledge and it is the Ontological Argument. This argument is based on the knowledge that God does
To understand God you must first get a decent understanding of the bible. The bible has been translated from the
Therefore: (5) God exists. The first premise of this argument, (1), is Anselm’s conception of God. (2) is a simple logical truth; if God is the greatest conceivable being then there is no greater conceivable being, (3) follows simply from (1) and (2).
perfection, and therefore, if he were not to exist, there would have to be a higher form of
What is the element in us by which we know and love, by which therefore we decide?
Can God truly be defined? Yes and no! It is important to know the facts about God which one can get from studying the Bible. Secondly, it is important to fellowship with God to get to know Him on a personal and intimate level. There are so many characteristics of God as He was and is perfect in all
The ontological argument can be stated in this way: “God is the greatest being imaginable. One of the aspects of perfection or greatness is existence. Thus, God exists.” Or put another way—“The fact that God can be conceived means that he must exist.”
If someone understands 'that which nothing greater can be conceived', then 'that which nothing greater can be conceived' exists in someone's understanding. (from 1 and 2)
The first one being that God is the author of creation. God has always existed with the Son and Holy Spirit. They are three-in-one and are eternal beings. We are told in the Bible that God created the heavens and the earth and he is pleased with what he has created.
Most major arguments of God are rooted in the existence, or lack thereof. However there has been a continuous debate regarding the specific characteristics of God. In this debate, Charles Hartshorne, Alfred North Whitehead, and other the processed theologians oppose Anselm, Augustine, and other classic theologians. Although there are many points of disagreement, there are some characteristics for which both sides can agree upon. I will show one strong point of agreement and one strong point of opposition, and allow you the opportunity to decide for yourself how different, or similar, these two camps are.
God however, is a substance that is not finite; God is of the highest level of reality, an infinite substance. There are three levels of reality with properties or modes at the lowest, finite substances such as humans in the middle and an infinite substance, i.e. God as the highest (Thompson, 30).
a) Christians believe many different things about God’s nature; due to the huge spectrum of Christians that there are. However, as a general rule they perceive God as being one of the following four things:
By God I understand a being absolutely infinite, i.e., a substance consisting of an infinity of attributes, of which one expresses an eternal and infinite essence (1def6)