preview

Aristotle's Virtue Ethics: Systemic Inequality And Racism

Decent Essays

Aristotle’s virtue ethics assume that moral virtue is necessary for flourishing, It logically follows, then, that those exhibiting the ordinary vices of domination, despite appearances to the contrary, are far from ever attaining a truly good life. Aristotle’s ethics are too narrow in scope, because any code of ethics should be universally applicable and equal because reinforcing privilege and oppressive structures negatively affect everyone's chances--including the perpetrator’s-- at developing the virtues described in Nicomachean Ethics and therefore negatively affect everyone's chances at leading the best life possible. Aristotle’s virtue ethics first narrow their scope with his understanding that one would need to be materially secure first in order to perform virtuous activities listed that make a person virtuous. His logic seems to be based on …show more content…

Despite the constant struggles against racism (not to mention other forms of oppression), that have been going on since the establishment of the United States, the effects of the inequality prevalent in the texts that formed the framework of our nation have led to the continuation of institutional and systemic inequality and racism. Institutional racism is distinguished by the existence of institutional systemic policies, practices and economic and political structures that place minority racial and ethnic groups at a disadvantage in relation to an institution’s privileged group. The fact that these governing documents have been written with an overt bias towards white male Americans is one of great faults of the nation and largest contributor to systemic inequality, which thrives despite attempts to equalize. Through this, it is clear that simply adjusting Aristotelian ethics is not enough for them to truly be of use to a broader range of the

Get Access