This week we read and discussed the first part of This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War by Drew Faust. Faust’s thesis, stated in the preface, is: “At war’s end this shared suffering would override persisting difference about the meanings of race, citizenship, and nationhood to establish sacrifice and its memorialization as the goring on which North and South would ultimately reunite (Faust xiii).” The way that America, North and South reacted is in the way that the survivors took care of the injured and what the North and South did with the dead bodies scattered all over the country. Faust’s first chapter, “Dying,” begins with the definition of the Good Death among Christians and other denominations at the time and how this idea played a role in the Civil War. This idea feeds into Faust’s theory by saying, “Civil war death thus narrowed theological and denominational differences. The shared crisis of battle yielded a common effort to make the notion of a Good Death available to all (Faust 8).” This idea of the Good Death was so sought after that it had to be meticulously prepared for; …show more content…
Faust says, “In the Civil Warpath was hardly hidden, but it was nevertheless, seemingly paradoxically, denied — not through silence and invisibility but through an active and concerted work of reconceptualization that rendered it a cultural preoccupation (Faust 177).” Instead of hiding death, Faust says that culturally people began to truly believe and hope for the reunion the families would experience with their dead soldiers in the afterlife. “Death as a termination of life simply did not exist (Faust 177).” This is important because people began to become more religious in an attempt to understand the amount of death that was surrounding them in such great magnitude for the first time in American
Although the Pericles’ Funeral Oration and the Gettysburg Address are hundreds of years apart, many have taken note of the similarities between these two memoirs for fallen soldiers of war. A powerful funeral oration from Athenian culture inspired Abraham Lincoln’s address to the Union during the Civil War. Both the Athenians and the Union were in the midst of fighting another power at the time. The value placed on liberty and democracy amongst these two groups was strong. Although citizens were treated differently and the concept of which people were deserving of rights differed, the Gettysburg Address and Pericles’ Funeral Oration similarly ensured their military conquests and sacrifices would be historically significant as it brings great honor and pride to their respective states. Their deaths were not in vain and would further push the ideas of these two respective societies.
The tensions of the Civil War are very much still alive in the Southern United States one hundred and fifty years after the Confederacy surrendered to Union forces to end the war. While the tensions may have mitigated away from full-fledged war between North and South, there still remain tensions along racial and cultural lines well beyond the war. In Tony Horwitz’s Confederates in the Attic these long standing tensions left over from the war are delved into by Horwitz as he makes his way across the south to see how the old Confederacy is viewed in the modern world of the United States. What Horwitz found was a dualistic society differing views on the Confederacy and the events of the Civil War. Dualities left from the war in aspects such as racial tensions, the meaning of the Confederate flag even between North and South entirely. Those living in the South can be seen holding a resonating connection to the Civil War. It becomes clear in Confederates in the Attic the Civil War not only became the catalyst of such dualities in Southern society, but still further shape and perpetuate these dualities long after the Civil Wars conclusion.
The first war of this type is perhaps the American Civil War. Thousands of men died hundreds of miles away from home without being taken care of at their last moment, which contradicted the contemporary Victorian values. The mass casualties, combined with primitive communication methods, left many families uncertain about the fate of their loved ones. Drew Faust’s This Republic of Suffering, argues that these situations made the Union government realize that as the volunteer citizen soldiers had paid their ultimate price to save the country, the country was reciprocally responsible for accounting them and taking care of their remains. If the state left the duty to individual families to recover their loved ones, only the wealthy families could afford such practice, which was against the basic principles of democracy and equality that the Union fought for. She also argued that an accurate counting of casualties and the construction of national cemeteries demonstrated the recognition of their sacrifice by the country, thus to justify the tremendous price for defending the nation unity. The identification of the dead and their honorable burial or repatriation not only brought closure to their families, but also facilitated the distribution of pensions and back payment, which were also duties of a modern state with expanding
The American Civil War, the most terrifying and horrific war fought in America. In the 1860 presidential election Republicans were led by Abraham Lincoln who did not support slavery at all. even though he had slaves, he did not like it and he opposed the expansion of slavery in the US territories. The problem was that the seven slave states with cotton-based economics needed their slaves to keep their economy up and running, so they formed the Confederacy. These first 7 states to secede had a 48.8% population of slaves. President James Buchanan and the Republicans rejected secession as illegal. The remaining 8 slave states rejected the call for secession. A peace conference was arranged but failed to find a compromise and both sides prepared for war. The South was very angry with the north because they felt as if they were taking away their state rights, The Southern Position that citizens of every states did have the right to take their property anywhere in the U.S. and not have it taken away. Specifically their slaves. But Northerners rejected this right because it would violate the right of a free state. This did not make the South happy, and for the North taking away their rights and trying to end slavery, the Confederate was formed and this is what started the deadly war.
Although the horrors of the American Civil War and Reconstruction within Indian Territory were fresh. Yet, the presence of Indian Territory changed drastically between 1865 and 1889, because of the “Second Trail of Tears”, the unrest of the Southern Plains tribes of western Indian Territory, and the impact of U.S. Polices on Indian Territory.
The Civil War had a tremendous death toll. In fact, it had more deaths than any of the previous wars combined. At the time, it was thought that the soldiers in battle died from the wounds or amputations they received. The true cause of death came from disease. These harsh conditions were contributed by unqualified doctors and non-sterile equipment. During the Civil War, the true issue was not only the wounds received in battle but the infectious diseases that ultimately led to the soldier’s death. When this was discovered, doctors knew some action needed to take place. Hospitals and sanitation standards were improved. The Civil War contributed to an evolution of medicine and how to combat victims plagued with disease.
Faust begins her book with the preface, the Work of Death, giving a brief explanation of the life changing events that took place during the war, and how drastically death affected the nation. Faust goes on to say that “the United States embarked on a new relationship with death.” The denouement of Faust’s book includes her compelling, influential epilogue, entitled Surviving. Each of her nine chapters touched on a different part of the war, and reached for a further explanation and meaning. Faust’s main ambition of her writing is to prove that the deaths of the Civil War were more complex than what this generation assumes.
Lincoln suggests that the two thoroughly different ideas of the North and South to become one once again, as he also juxtaposes life and death in the same speech, almost as to compare the ideals of the North and South to the ideas of life and death. Lincoln matched his uniting tone with his juxtaposed exemplars. Lincoln compassion for the Civil War is shown as he mourns the loss of many fellow Americans, not differentiating between Union and Confederate soldiers. He creates juxtaposition in his final statement of a “new birth” and the obstruction of a “perished” nation. His patriotic address charms his audience into action. The usage of juxtaposition allows Lincoln to transfer the zeal in his speech into action by uniting the people of America.
The many social and economic changes happening in the North and the South during the years leading up to the Civil War divided the individuals of the country. The issue of slavery was becoming more prevalent during this time. There were many individuals that were contributing to the mainstream media trying to persuade the people of America to believe their specific point of view is the right way. The social and economic changes in American society produced feelings of separation for the North and South. The Narrative of Lavinia Bell and A Letter to an English Abolitionist were some of many writings that were created to divide and influence the individuals of the Nation at this time.
Lincoln suggests that the two exceedingly contrary ideas of the North and South to become one once again, as he also juxtaposes life and death in the same speech, as to compare the ideals of the North and South to the ideas of life and death. Lincoln matched his uniting tone with his juxtaposed exemplars. Lincoln’s compassion for the Civil War is shown as he mourns the loss of many fellow Americans, not differentiating between Union and Confederate soldiers. He creates juxtaposition in his final statement of a “new birth” and the obstruction of a “perished” nation. His patriotic address appeals his audience into action. The usage of juxtaposition allows Lincoln to transfer the zeal in his speech into action by uniting the people of America.
The Civil War was a period of racial injustice and a time of great loss for the people of America. During Abraham Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address, he creates a moral framework for peace and reconciliation with the use of many rhetorical strategies. With a sincere but reflective tone, Abraham Lincoln highlights the reality of the troubled nation and the solution to all of the problems, which is unity. Lincoln repeats strong phrases to enhance the theme, references to a holy figure, and creates simple, yet structured ideas to achieve his purpose of reuniting the broken nation.
The Civil War shook the United States in 1861, forcing families and soldiers, both in the North and South, to reevaluate what it meant to live and die under less-than-ideal circumstances. In Drew Gilpin Faust’s essay, titled The Civil War Soldier and the Art of Dying, Faust goes through every change the Civil War made in the standard perception of death and mourning at the time and the lasting implications death in the Civil War would have for years to come. In every sense, the changes Faust outlines were put in place to cater towards the They of Heideggerian thought and ultimately did not help Civil War soldiers and families think authentically about death, but rather shaped social norms that still support the They and prohibit Dasein from authentically anticipating death as a possibility.
Coming back to disagreements and poilitical issues that began soon after the American Revolution. There were a number of circumstances that led the United States into a excruciating civil war. The problems between the North and the South grew more intense between the years 1800 and 1860. Although i twas not the only one, slavery was the central issue of the conflicts. There was another point of major disagreement between the two sides in the involved taxes paid on goods brought from foreign countries. It was called tariff. Southerners felt that those tarrifs were unfair toward them and were doing in purpose because they imported a broader variety of goods than Northerners.
During the Civil War, certain events had taken place that have changed our nation as a whole. The social aspect of these changes to our country have shifted the way we interact with each other from the end of the Civil War to present day. A major social change that occurred during the war resulted from the Emancipation Proclamation. Although this social change took place during the war, its effects lasted well past the end of the Civil war. The change was how people negatively viewed the freed slaves and how they reacted to them integrating within their society. There were also positive social changes that resulted from the war regarding a woman’s role in society. As a result of the men fighting in the war, the women were able to take on roles that they would never normally do. The social changes that occurred in our country as a result
By all estimation, the American Civil War was considered to be the bloodiest and most gruesome war in American history. There are more US casualties involved in the American Civil War than US casualties in World War I & II, Korean, and Vietnam War combined. Historians have discussed possible causes that led to the greatest separation among the American people. It is important to recognize the true causes behind this separation so that history does not repeat itself. It is important to recognize the true cause behind this separation so that history of a civil war does not repeat itself. It is best to examine and understand one fundamental cause so that appropriate measures can be taken to prevent another repeat of the past. Current research as well as old documents demonstrate that the conflict over the legality of African American slaves is the main cause to such separation. However, many tend to overlook the economic reason that benefited both the northern and southern states. While it is clear that the Southern states benefited more from slavery due to the vastness of uninhabited land, both southern and northern states benefited in one way or another. Therefore, it makes one wonder: To what extent economic motive between the southern and northern states spurred the American civil war? Although causes like slavery, greed, and fear factor into the causes of the American Civil War, the economic motive between the southern and northern states spurred