preview

Civil War Suffering

Good Essays

This week we read and discussed the first part of This Republic of Suffering: Death and the American Civil War by Drew Faust. Faust’s thesis, stated in the preface, is: “At war’s end this shared suffering would override persisting difference about the meanings of race, citizenship, and nationhood to establish sacrifice and its memorialization as the goring on which North and South would ultimately reunite (Faust xiii).” The way that America, North and South reacted is in the way that the survivors took care of the injured and what the North and South did with the dead bodies scattered all over the country. Faust’s first chapter, “Dying,” begins with the definition of the Good Death among Christians and other denominations at the time and how this idea played a role in the Civil War. This idea feeds into Faust’s theory by saying, “Civil war death thus narrowed theological and denominational differences. The shared crisis of battle yielded a common effort to make the notion of a Good Death available to all (Faust 8).” This idea of the Good Death was so sought after that it had to be meticulously prepared for; …show more content…

Faust says, “In the Civil Warpath was hardly hidden, but it was nevertheless, seemingly paradoxically, denied — not through silence and invisibility but through an active and concerted work of reconceptualization that rendered it a cultural preoccupation (Faust 177).” Instead of hiding death, Faust says that culturally people began to truly believe and hope for the reunion the families would experience with their dead soldiers in the afterlife. “Death as a termination of life simply did not exist (Faust 177).” This is important because people began to become more religious in an attempt to understand the amount of death that was surrounding them in such great magnitude for the first time in American

Get Access