Ashleigh Ramsey Ramsey 1
Mr.Kirkindoll
AP U.S. History Third Hour
10 December 2014
Universal
Emerson's opinion on history in his essay “History” is thought provoking. Emerson often views history as a prevalent or “universal mind”. This universal mind is common and accessible to all men. History is often viewed as the record of the universal mind and is also contained in that universal mind. Therefore, Emerson is able to say, “Man is explicable by nothing less than all his history”. Emerson tends to believe in a certain relation between the hours of a lifetime and the centuries of the time itself. If one thinks history is something that happened in the past, one is mistaken. History is very similar to nature in a way. “It is the universal nature which gives worth to particular men and things.” In nature there is an endless variety of things, but
…show more content…
Bringing historical to a personal level is a great way to make it relevant, and turn it from studying the dates to the actual ideas of the people and what they valued. A mans experiences in life are facts that he stores. Knowledge and one’s life experiences are better than looking it up in a book. An example of Emerson’s universal mind is when he says, “Of the Universal mind each individual man is one more incarnation.” This means that every man can contain their divine idiosyncrasy. All of their idiosyncrasies are divined by nature, not by their personal beliefs or choices. This interpretation is possible because there is within us the same motive that has came from other men's thought. We are able to understand their motives through our own understanding of the reactions to our
Why is there racial tension and political dissension in America? Why did Russia feel its Crimean invasion was justifiable? How did China become an economic power? These questions are answered by a proper understanding of history, helping us to better comprehend the world of 2015. Education’s role needs to be thus: to prepare students as learned individuals and to exist in such an international community. This is why I think history is still incredibly relevant despite focusing on the
This paper deals with ways history can be interpreted and influences different interpretations have on society and individuals. This is explored through
First, the “conviction that envy is ignorance,” is important in relation to the discussion around the historical figures mentioned earlier. If “envy is ignorance,” then one shouldn’t view another as having more or being better and this explains why Emerson doesn’t hold the great thinkers of the past with high esteem. Also, the use of the word “ignorance” is intriguing when juxtaposed with Emerson’s definition of “genius” since the two are polar opposites in actual definition but, in Emerson’s world, “ignorance” could be attained alongside “genius,” since the two are not mutually exclusive. A man could believe his truth to be true for everyone and still be envious of the man next to him, Emerson’s other revelation, that “imitation is suicide,” returns to the individualized thought he advocated earlier, but now with more severe terms. The word “suicide” makes it seem as though copying someone else is equal to the death or the very end of one’s existence. Not only, now, is not stepping out of conformity a lack of genius, but conforming is now a death sentence. Emerson is really pushing for every man to be his own person with his own, different thoughts. Finally, Emerson’s conclusion to this argument, that “[every man] must take himself fir better, for worse, as his portion,” muddles the idea that “genius” is believing one’s thoughts to be universal. If every man takes himself “as his portion,” then his confidence, discussed earlier, is severely limited and, therefore, his beliefs that, according to Emerson, he should apply to everyone are lessened in size and value along with his confidence. Emerson is arguing that people, in order to attain “genius,” need to apply their beliefs universally, but at the same time, he is arguing that conformity, which would be found in universality, is awful for education and
In reading a Little History of the World by E.H. Gombrich you realize that history seems so much less complicated when you are the one standing back and reflecting on the past. You realize how easy it is to often forget that every single new idea, religion and war was a struggle that lasted generations upon generations. History is more than just a page or a story, its our account of the world. That goes to show how short life and history is, you realize that history is always repeating, war after war, peace then war. There are good and bad periods in history and its up to us to learn from them. In a way history is much like a human being it goes through stages, learns about life, and has inner struggles or wars about their ideas and their beliefs.
To begin with, what is history? The answer to this question varies depending on whom is being inquired. Predominantly, history is regarded as the study of the evolution of ideas or events in chronological order. History is frequently applied to study topics such as economics, culture, politics and society. However, it can also be utilized to clarify alternative topics such as science, ideology, technology and more. The challenging aspect of history is to obtain documents and sources that are not biased or are coherent enough to trust.
Emerson probably would imagine an adult that would emerge from an education based on the principles he supports would be hungry for the truth, would look towards the future and learning, would not be afraid to share his ideas but what know for the most part right from wrong, and he would have enthusiasm associated to learning. This adult be it a girl or boy will be a college of knowledge or a wealth of knowledge with their own thoughts and opinions.
The importance of our world's history is huge, because it teaches us about our past and how we came to be in the world we live in today. History can help you learn about our ancestor’s origins and cultures.
Emerson compares the individual, the original mind to the minds of Moses, Plato, and Milton in his first paragraph. He describes them as not speaking the thoughts of men, but the thoughts of themselves. This is to show if these men can be viewed in such a light for as task such as speaking with their own individuality, then all men can be great and do the same.
Emerson begins his major work on individualism by declaring the importance of thinking for oneself instead of humbly acquiring someone else’s belief. Emerson says, “To believe that what is true in your private heart is true for all men — that is genius”. The one who scorns personal intuition and, instead, chooses to admit others' opinions lacks the inventive power necessary for strong, fearless individualism. Emerson says, “Trust thyself,” a saying that ties along this initial section of the essay. This simply resembles to believe others' judgments is poor-spirited, with no inspiration or hope. An individual with dignity, exhibits originality and is childish unspoiled by egoistic desires but mature. Emerson currently focuses his attention
Time is our past, present and future, history is our past and circumstance is a result of both time and history. The quote “ I am what time, circumstance, history, have made of me, certainly, but I am also much more than that. So are we all,” mentioned in James Baldwin's literary piece “ Sonny’s Blues,” indicates that everyone and everything is a product of time, circumstance and history. Though this is true, we are much more than that because of our ability to go beyond the human condition. Phenomena is a combination of the factors of time, circumstance and history, but every single person and place in the world is more than what is advertised. In other words the past can influence the future, and we can all be much more than what history conditioned us to be. There is history in the places we live, along with the era and setting surrounding that place our lives can be greatly influenced by our settings and can affect the choices we make. However, everyone has a special purpose or talent that enables them to create a history of their own.
To know the past is to know the future. In his essay Knowing History and Knowing Who We Are, David McCullough argues about the importance of studying and teaching history. In his essay, he explains that there are three main points about history: character and its effect upon destiny, our failure of teaching the future generation, and the importance of learning and listening to history. David McCullough strongly advocates that audience should start to listen to and teach about the past in order to learn about the way a person’s character can affect their destiny.
While many critics deride Hanson for being a reactionary, or wanting to undo the social progress of his generation and return America to a 1950s ideal, I purpose that through Hanson, who may be several of the previously stated pejoratives, we can see just how much the work of history has changed during the twentieth century. History from below, or as it is also known as “people’s history” is usually seen as belonging to those concerned more with social history than military, but so too is Hanson.
History is defined as the study of the science of humanity in the past. It's a broad subject that spans over countless people groups throughout the years that the world has been around. Even before the times we have written word history was still being made, and it is still extremely important. We tend to forget that in our average day to day lives we are still making history. That all over the globe everyone is taking part in what might be in a history book someday.
As Emerson perceived the world, “Man postpones or remembers; he does not live in the present, but with reverted eye laments the past, or, heedless of the riches that surround him, stands on tiptoes to foresee the future. He cannot be happy and strong until he too lives with nature in the present, above time” (“Self-Reliance” 833-834). Even if a man finds himself with both self-trust and originality, he may never realize his true potential if he is preoccupied with past events or future fortunes. Emerson finds these obsessions to be utterly useless: “Discontent is the want of self-reliance; it is the infirmity of will. Regret calamities, if you can thereby help the sufferer; if not, attend to your own work, and already the evil begins to be repaired” (838). In contemporary society, a willingness to “live in the moment” is highly regarded, especially among youth, yet this acceptance seems to wane with age. Nevertheless, excessive anxiousness and nostalgia are a waste of the potential that can be realized when the truths of the present are
The definition of history, is a question which has sparked international debate for centuries between the writers, readers, and the makers of history. It is a vital topic which should be relevant in our lives because it?s important to acknowledge past events that have occurred in our world that deeply influences the present. This essay will discuss what history is, and why we study it.