preview

Indian Removal Act Argumentative

Decent Essays

Indian Removal Act Argumentative Imagine you’re a Native American in 1830 walking the Trail of Tears. Half dead, starving, and homeless. Soldiers are surrounding your tribe from the American Government forcing you to move across the country. In 1830 President Jackson placed the Indian Removal Act which allowed U.S. soldiers to remove Native American tribes from Georgia and other eastern lands to new discovered western lands. Others feel Native Americans should be moved to western lands because Americans thought they were relieving the Natives from Government control, and allowing them to live their own way. But Americans had no right to take the Natives land and gave them no choice other wise. Native Americans should not be moved to western lands because the Supreme Court stated Americans had no right to take and remove the Natives from their land. …show more content…

In the article, “Trail of Tears”, the author states, “... the U.S. Supreme Court objected to these practices and affirmed that native nations were sovereign nations “in which the laws of Georgia can have no force”(History.com). This demonstrates how state laws can not be forced on native tribes for personal needs like gold or land which most Americans were trying to take from Native American territory. According to Sara McGill, “The issue was pursued a year later in 1832 in Worcester vs. Georgia. Marshall, consistent with his former decision, said that Georgian laws had no power in Cherokee territory”(McGill1). This quotation demonstrates chief justice John Marshall making his last and final decision that Georgians and no other American citizen had Supreme Court back up to force Natives out of their land for selfless

Get Access