Organizational Behavior Project “Blow Up” 1: What happened to the A-Team? The A-Team was forced to disband because from the very first tasking, there was conflict between the group members. The group never actually came together to complete their first tasking of defining roles. The arguments between the group members got so bad that one of their team members walked out for the group and threatened to quit the program. Why did the group process break down? The group process broke down because there was never a group. This group began with a group of five individuals who had strong opinionated views as of the relevancy of their professions and experience. Instead of getting together as a group and mutually deciding how …show more content…
Katie didn’t even recognize Pranarisha as a Thai and just assumes her being Vietnamese. Power Differentials: Aran felt that he should be the leader of the group because he has the most experience in the group. He also feels that the rest of the group is young and inexperienced therefore have no business being the leader. Katie feels that she has more experience in finance than Aran therefore the rest of the group feels that experience doesn’t necessarily relate to leadership. Communication Problems: It seems that all members of the group had willingness to openly disagree with each other. The women felt they needed to maintain “face” to the men in the group. There was no amount of time devoted to establishing personal relationships. This can be seen by Katie not knowing that Pranarisha was of Thai descent and barely even knew her name. All members spoke assertively, especially with Rebecca who immediately assumed Aran was stereotyping and discriminating against women. Pranarisha didn’t speak English but her walking away from the group probably spoke the largest volume of all the group members. 3. What could have been
An organizational analysis is an important tool to become familiar with how medical businesses and organizations are able to meet standards of care, provide services for the community and provide employment to health care providers. There are many different aspects to evaluate in an organizational analysis. This paper will describe these many aspects and apply the categories to the University Medical Center (UMC) as the organization being analyzed.
To organize and prioritize the current and future projects in the pipeline in a way that fits into the PMB budget of $5B, and ensures projects that increase sales, growth, and stockholder value are of top priority, whereas projects that are not beneficial are either put on hold or discarded.
“Political Activity is alive and well in organisations. Critically discuss this statement. What factors result in Organisational Politics and what is the role of such behaviour on other people at work?”
The study of Organizational Behavior (OB) is related to individuals, group of people working together in teams. The study becomes more challenging when situational factors interact. No two individuals are likely to behave in the same manner in a particular work situation. It is the predictability of a manager about the expected behavior of an individual. There are no absolutes in human behavior. It is the human factor that is contributory to the productivity hence the study of human behavior is important. Great importance therefore must be attached to the study.
After starting this organizational behavior (OB) class, I’ve been able to more deeply evaluate the importance of the way people interact in the workplace. More so, I have been learning to take the time to reflect on myself as a person, a student, and a soon to be working professional. The fact of the matter is – there is always room for improvement. I’m looking to improve on every possible aspect of my life I can. Not to sound like a cliché or anything, but it seems as though life sometimes gets in the way of being able to take a step back and assess yourself.
Group member cohesiveness was absent from the group meeting for several reasons, but the primary reasons were due to the fact that the group members did not have a common description of value or structure to the discussion. Each member viewed their own area of involvement within the organization as being more valuable than any other area, and it was this exclusion of other valuable traits that lead the group to begin to clash in such a
The final stage of a “group is the closing stage” (Gladding, pg. 145). This is a part of the group stage “that wasn’t even addressed until the 1970’s” (Gladding, pg. 145). There was an attitude that this stage wasn’t important “because it was considered a natural phenomenon and assumed group leaders and member knew what to do” (Gladding, pg. 145). This oversight may be responsible for “harmful or hurtful results that lead to an unsuccessful group ending” (Gladding, pg. 156). This is why the ending of a group must be “prepared for and thought out to avoid acts of transference and countertransference” (Gladding, pg. 161).
Organizational Behavior Management (OBM) is a vital part of the success of a company. The employee’s thoughts and actions even considering culture are thoroughly analyzed. This idea allows managers to improve not only individual behavior but also group dynamic performances/interactions and workers safety. This theory is considered as a science of the behavior of each employee. The history of OBM started in the 1900’s, with the strong influence of Skinner and Watson. Scientific Behavior began in the workplace, following the applications of behavioral principles to instructional design. Frederick Taylor, another innovative manager was a huge supporter of the scientific method being presented and utilized. Three main areas of OBM application include: Performance Management, Behavioral Systems Analysis, and Behavior-Based Safety. Inside of each area, there are key points to consider. Some would be leadership, decision making, team building, motivation, and job satisfaction. In short, OBM is the study that reviews how organizational structures are an aftermath within companies.
Organizational Behavior has taught me a lot in regards to learning to work with others and making groups of people work efficiently. While classroom readings and in-class slideshows have been valuable in understanding key concepts, my greatest personal growth has come from both your personal stories, as well as your many invaluable speakers. Throughout this paper, I will focus on the lessons your speakers have taught me, and how those shared lessons will have a positive impact on my future decision-making.
One thing the organization could do to raise the gender consciousness would be to do an ongoing series of sensitivity training for all staff. Along with this training would be annual assessment seminars that will teach people the different types of discrimination and harassment and the steps they need to take when such a situation is posed upon them. In the Cancer center where I am employed, women make up nearly 70% of the managerial and supervisory staff in all departments. At the executive level they only make up
When doing so the other group members were active listener, by using their whole body verbally and nonverbal. Like facing the speaker and giving eye contact and try to avoided interruption. The group also acknowledges the thoughts of the speaker by giving constructive feed back. Due to the effectiveness of the group communication, we were able to build trust, respect and understand the issues and make decision for effective change. We illustrate this by coming together as a group one again to accomplish the goal we initially wanted to accomplish. Since the first organization that we had chosen was incorrect, so we had to make the necessary changes to accomplish our goals. The other effective feature is the purpose of the group. Kozier et al (2010) stated that the effective group purpose is when “goal, task, and outcomes are clarified. Understanding and modified so that members of the group can commit themselves to purposes through cooperation” (p.401). For instance, each individual was assign a task and knew what was to be accomplished. As group we all decided to meet at suitable day and time which was beneficial to all team members, because we could commit to the group and focus on what needed to be achieved.
Organisational Behaviour (OB) is the study of human behaviour in an organisation. It is a multidisciplinary field devoted to the understanding individual and group behaviour, interpersonal processes and organisational dynamics. OB is important to all management functions, roles and skills. Since organisations are built up levels - individual, group and an organizational system as a whole, it is important for managers to understand human behaviour in order to meet the organizations overall goals. I found several key learning areas that are meaningful, interesting and relevant to my work over the course of studying this unit. These key learning areas have not only expanded and improved my view of organisational behaviour but they also have
According to Kinicki, & Fugate, (2016), “the term Organization Behavior (OB) describes an interdisciplinary field dedicated to understand and managing people at work, this includes self-management. OB draws in research and practice from many disciplines to deal with how people behave at work, including: Anthropology, economics, ethics, management, organization theory, political science, psychology, sociology, statics, and vocational counseling” (Kinicki, & Fugate, 2016, p. 4). During this process, it is important to determine how to apply OB to minimize the impact that it may have to “Employee Productivity”; therefore, the organizations must use OB concepts and tools when is appropriate, and should not depend or rely on a single best way to manage each situation. Throughout the use OB concepts and tools such as the Integrative Framework, organizations can find ways to understand, and apply OB (Inputs, Processes, and Outcomes) in order to keep employee productivity to the desired level. Organization Behavior (OB) must use tools to help identify the problems, causes, and solutions in relation to employee productivity.
The success of a corporation has been traditionally tied to how well the managers execute the roles of leading, planning and controlling. One of the key components of the controlling aspect of management is the evaluation of the people that they are managing. The function of this process involves monitoring performance goals and has management taking corrective actions when necessary. Performance evaluations can be described as the measurement of the performance of an employee related to defined measures, using an applicable performance goals and appropriate criteria that relates to the employees work in question. This paper will review the engineer’s evaluation in the given case study.
Organizational behavior is the behavior of individuals, either one or a group. It is not the behavior of an organization, but rather the behavior of the people in an organization. This can be anywhere from a family at home to a church to a work group within a company. Some of the challenges that make behaviors challenging in today’s workplace are high performance, ethical behavior, productivity improvement, technology utilization, quality, diversity, work-life balance, and the global economy, (Schermerhorn, 2003, P. 1).