preview

Tolstoy Exit Through The Gift Shop Analysis

Decent Essays

Simply put, there are two sides of people in the street art world. On one hand, there are those who intend to convey meaningful messages through their art and on the other hand, there are those who convey hateful or inappropriate messages. Using Tolstoy’s definition of art, “not the production of pleasing objects; and, above all, it is not pleasure; but it is a means of union among men, joining them together in the same feelings,” both forms of street art are to be considered art (Tolstoy). But the most significant ethical question raised by Exit Through the Gift Shop is not whether both forms of street art is art. Instead, the most significant ethical question brought up by the film is whether street art should be illegal or legal. This question is brought up many times throughout the documentary. It is brought up when Banksy mentions that street art is not permanent and when Thierry is caught by the police. Furthermore, Banksy wanted a documentary to be made to capture all the art before it disappeared. There is no doubt the question whether street art is illegal or legal is significant. Additionally, this question can not be left unanswered. Should street art be illegal? …show more content…

Anyone who watched the film saw street artists Shepard Fairey, Mr. Brainwash, Space Invader, and Banksy put up their art on walls that were not their own. These walls belonged to other people and now they were most likely ruined by street art. It is not right to alter someone else’s property without consent. This is known as vandalism. A common argument that goes against this is how the person may end up preferring the street art on the wall. It would be a lie to say this did not happen before. However, chances are people do not appreciate their walls being vandalized. There is usually more harm done. It is consequentialist to say that vandalism does more harm than good. Because vandalism is more harmful and illegal, street art should be

Get Access