preview

Wilkerson Co. Essay examples

Decent Essays

Wilkerson’s competitive situation is that of declining profits due largely to chronic and severe price-cutting on pumps, the company’s main product in terms of units produced (Exhibit 4). Being a standard commodity product, demand for pumps is price elastic, and customers look for the cheapest price irrespective of the company they buy from. With its competitors constantly lowering their prices, Wilkerson’s only option for remaining competitive in the pump market was to match these price cuts. As a result, the actual selling price of pumps is $87, well below the target selling price of $107.69 (Exhibit 2). Consequently, Wilkerson’s actual gross margin of 19.5% on pumps is well below the company’s uniform target line of 35% for all …show more content…

This suggests that Wilkerson’s traditional cost structure is fairly accurate when applied to valves. The accuracy of this cost method for Wilkerson’s initial product likely explains its continued use when the company expanded to pumps and flow controllers. Another factor that may be positively contributing to valve sales is the customer loyalty Wilkerson established due to its high-quality products. While valves and pumps are commodity products, flow controllers are highly customized products that require more detailed manufacturing, whereas pumps and valves can be manufactured in an “assembly-line” style. As Exhibit 4 shows, flow controllers have substantially more production runs, shipments, and engineering work than valves and pumps, despite having the least production and machine hours per work. The large number of production runs and hours of engineering work are due to the unique nature of each product, requiring more detailed engineering and different components for each product. Since each flow controller is relatively unique, it is more difficult for Wilkerson to ship in bulk, which explains the fact that over 70% of Wilkerson’s total shipments are allocated to flow controllers. Despite all this, Wilkerson maintains a healthy 41% gross margin on flow controllers, even after raising prices by 10% of the target price. This is likely due to either a high-quality product relative to its competitors, or the standard unit cost of flow controllers being

Get Access