The figure below shows the marginal benefit and marginal cost curves for a pollution cleanup project. Pollution Cleanup Benefits and Costs 2,750 2,500 2,250 2,000 1,750 1,500 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 0 MC MB 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 Quantity of Pollution Cleaned Up What is the optimal level of pollution cleanup? Multiple Choice 2,500 units О 1,500 units О 125 units 225 units

The figure below shows the marginal benefit and marginal cost curves for a pollution cleanup project. Pollution Cleanup Benefits and Costs 2,750 2,500 2,250 2,000 1,750 1,500 1,250 1,000 750 500 250 0 MC MB 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 Quantity of Pollution Cleaned Up What is the optimal level of pollution cleanup? Multiple Choice 2,500 units О 1,500 units О 125 units 225 units

Principles of Economics 2e

2nd Edition

ISBN:9781947172364

Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Publisher:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro

Chapter12: Environmental Protection And Negative Externalities

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 38CTQ: How can high-income countries benefit from covering much of the cost of reducing pollution created...

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Water rescue situation Determine what should be done first and last as well as the available resources in the scenarios. 1. You were on the schools swimming pool to practice your butterfly stroke for an upcoming competition and are the only one in the pool area when you noticed someone floating in the pool's 8ft area. When you checked what it was, you were shocked to find a person floating and unresponsive to your calls.
Environmental Economics. The equations below describe the marginal costs of abatement for three separate sources (as a function of pollution). %3D МC2 3D 24 - 2е2 МС3 %3 10 - е3/2 (Constructing a graphical presentation of the different cost functions may help) 1. What is the total cost of abatement if each source is forced to cut its pollution by half? 2. What are the cost-savings of an emissions price that achieves the same reduction as the command and control policy described in question 2?
11 When performing a benefit cost analysis of different options to provide clean water to a community, the option that should be chosen is the option that maximizes the benefit to cost ratio. True or False?
Time left 0:59:16 A colleague at work takes small amounts of IT supplies such as flash drive for her own personal use, saying that this is a tiny loss to the company. You tell her that if everyone were to take office supplies, then the loss would no longer be minimal. Your rationale expresses which of the following ethical issues: O a. Property issues O b. Accessibility issues O c. Accuracy issues O d. Privacy issues NEXT PAGE US PAGE
QUESTION 7 Choose a wrong statement about uniformly mixed fund pollutants. O The damage caused by uniformly mixed pollutants is relatively insensitive to where the emissions are injected into the atmosphere. A difficulty with emission charge is determining how high the charge should be set in order to ensure that the resulting emission reduction is at the desired level. The policy can focus simply on controlling the total amount of emissions in a manner that minimizes the cost of control. O The cost-effective allocation is found by equating the total control costs of the two sources.
Econ Return to Activity Score Mentor Mega Beans Market Booming Berries Booming Berries Materials Mark, if the external marginal cost from Booming Berries is $20 per thousand pounds, what is the socially efficient price per pound? 130 Booming Berrles 120 Clare 110 100 $70 90 80 70 Mark 60 That is correct! 50 40 30 Econ 20 Mentor 10 Mark, if the external marginal cost from Booming Berries is $20 per thousand pounds, what is the socially efficient quantity (in thousands)? 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 Quantity (in thousands) Clare Enter a response then click Submit below (in thousands) Submit MacBook Air F12 FI1 F9 F10 F8 F7 F6 888 F4 F5 F3 F2 esc F1 * & 24 % 8 @ # 7 3 4 2 T E Q tab Price (per pound)
Computer models of global climate changecaused by increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere predictnot only higher overall temperatures, but also more intense andfrequent heat waves. During the devastating European heatwave in the summer of 2003, between 35,000 and 52,000“excess deaths” occurred. Before taking specific actions toreduce carbon dioxide emissions, economists and politicians tryto estimate the costs. Should excess deaths be included as acost of inaction? If so, what value should we place on a life?
Firm 11 2 Initial Pollution Level 3 100 200 $20 $40 Above is tabulated the pollution level in tons for three different manufacturing firms, as well as their cost per ton of reducing pollution. The government has decided to limit total pollution to 300 tons, and distribute to each firm 100 permits, each allowing the firm to emit 1 ton of the pollutant. By how much would the total cost of the pollution reduction initiative be reduced if the firms are allowed to trade their permits, as opposed to not letting them trade them? Cost of Reducing Pollution by 1 Unit $10 300
stion 10 « < Questi 4 points Marginal Cost to Eliminate (Dollars) Firm First Unit Second Unit Third Unit Fourth Unit A 54 67 82 107 57 68 86 108 54 66 82 107 D 62 73 91 111 The table shows the marginal costs for each of four firms (A, B, C, and D) to eliminate units of pollution from their production processes. For example, for Firm A to eliminate one unit of pollution, it would cost $54, and for Firm A to eliminate a second unit of pollution it would cost an additional If the government wanted to reduce pollution from 16 units to exactly 8 units, which of the following fees per unit of pollution would achieve that goal? 70 O 85 O 87 O 80
Figure 1 mc plant 1 $3.00 $2.00 나 mc plant 2 $1.00 25% 50% 75% $4.00 Marginal Cost (per ton) of pollution reductionton ○ a). $1.10 Ob). $0.90 Oc). $0.60 100% Assume now that each plant in Figure 1 normally emits 100 tons of pollutant (so a 50% reduction means a reduction of 50 tons.). Assume the plants are issued permits for 50 tons of pollutant. Plant 2 might agree to sell one permit to Plant 1 (and Plant 1 would agree to pay) a price of... O d). either (b) or (c) above Pollution reduction
d. What is the socially optimal level of emissions for the industry per month? What would be the resulting total abatement cost per month? Total damage per month? Total social cost per month? e. If environmental authorities wished to control pollution in the industry by imposing an emission tax on pollution, what would be the optimal tax rate per ton of emissions? At this rate, how many tons of pollutants would the industry emit per month? What is the total tax bill to be collected per month? What would be the resulting total abatement cost per month?
A city currently emits 15 million gallons (MG) of raw sewage into a lake that is beside the city. Table 12.13 shows the total costs (TC) in thousands of dollars of cleaning up the sewage to different levels, together with the total benefits (TB) of doing so. Benefits include environmental, recreational, health, and industrial benefits. Using the information in Table 12.13 calculate the marginal costs and marginal benefits of reducing sewage emissions for this City. What is the optimal level of sewage for this city? How can you tell?