The ever-expanding biotech industry has produced copious amounts of genetically modified foods (GMFs); however, this huge upswing has most questioning whether or whether not GMFs are safe. What effects do genetically modified organisms (GMOs) have on our environment, and furthermore, what effects do they have on our health? Like most every story, there are two contrasting viewpoints of genetic engineering (GE). Today, the negativities associated with GE are far more represented in the media than the benefits. As a result, a growing majority of the population has a stern belief that all GMOs are unanimously bad; however, at the same time, research tells us that there are numerous advantages associated with GE.
The Opposition With GMOs
…show more content…
To begin, the opposition raises the possibility of genetic pollution. Jefferson states that, “The Pollen produced by these [genetically engineered] plants, carrying new genes, cannot be contained. As a result, genetic pollution of natural crop varieties and of wild plant relatives may occur.” For example, genetic pollution could result in “herbicide-resistant” weeds that are more “robust and abundant” than ordinary weeds (Miller; Mandel). In one case, an unmodified version of a canola plant was found to possess resistance to three different herbicides (Mandel). With this in mind, Mandel states that, “…genetically engineered plants may be more likely to cross-pollinate than their conventionally bred counterparts.” To emphasize, for one genetically modified squash, this statement was found to be a reality (Mandel). Eventually, Mandel warns, gene flow could lead to the extinction of unmodified wild species. Likewise, if genetically engineered plants were to spread into natural habitats, the outcome could be the complete upheaval of the affected ecosystem (Mandel). Furthermore, crops that are engineered to be pest-resistant may also pose a significant threat to both beneficial insects and pests; for example, various studies have concluded that the pollen of genetically modified corn is deadly to monarch butterfly larvae (Miller). Overall, there are several aspects of GMOs that may be detrimental to our environment. Secondly, opponents also insist that the
In a recent article found on Facebook, David Gutierrez described how Thierry Vrain, a former Genetically Modified Organism scientist recently changed his mind on how he personally feels about genetically modified organisms. Previous to this article Vrain was for GMOs and was taking on many experiments on GMOs. However now, he says that he rejects a previous statement of his that said “biotechnology companies engineered crops, have no impact on the environment and of course that they are safe to eat” (Gutierrez, 2016). More interesting about this newspaper article, is that Vrain also now claims that GMOs cause damage to bodily organs in the human, such as the kidneys, liver and spleen. (Gutierrez, 2016). I chose this article because I wanted to see what the real science behind GMOs is, since most crops are being engineered by GMOs. I also wanted to examine why after so long Vrain changed his mind on what he thinks of Genetically Modified Organisms.
Primarily, genetically engineered crops result in countless long-term, detrimental impacts on the environment. As the United States becomes increasingly dependent on such crops for a majority of its food supply, these harmful environmental impacts are becoming evident. Many GMO crops are modified to be herbicide-resistant, such as the Roundup Ready crop, which allows farmers to spray herbicides without causing damage to the plants. While the ridding of weeds increases the level of production for these farmers, their total elimination greatly interferes with the natural interdependency of the ecosystem. One impacted species includes the Monarch butterfly, as its population decline has been directly linked to the use of genetically engineered crops. The weeds being eliminated include the
In 2011, more than 66 million hectares of GMO plants were grown throughout the world. These plants were “engineered to produce a bacterial toxin lethal to some insects but harmless to people,” (Carrington 1). By altering the plant’s genes, scientists were able to design the plant in a way so it could control the pest population without the need of using as many chemicals in comparison to pesticides. Therefore altering the plant’s genes proves a method for controlling pest populations because it reduces the amount of harmful chemicals that are used. Pesticide use is dangerous to the environment because of the pollution involved. Studies have found that farmers using GMO seeds use 37% less pesticides, and since “these seeds don’t need to spray as much pesticide, which means less pesticide ends up washing off the fields and into streams” (Horowitz 2). Ultimately, pesticide pollution can endanger entire ecosystems and even threaten human lives. By significantly reducing pesticide use, there would be less dangerous chemicals to threaten local environments. As well as reducing pollution, GMO replacement of pesticides helps increase populations of pest predators. Carrington states that GMOs have the “added benefit of looking after the predators that could have been killed by the pesticides” (2). By substituting GMOs for pesticides, which kill more than just the targeted pest, farmers can help
A concern that is growing is what we are eating and how it is affecting us. A lot of food is processed today, causing concerns about GMOs. GMOs stands for genetically modified organisms; this means a living organism’s genetic material has been artificially changed in a laboratory. GMOs are combinations of plant, animal, bacteria, and viral genes that do not occur naturally or even through “traditional crossbreeding” methods. Many people have questions and concerns about GMOs, and more and more people are starting not to like them. GMOs have taken over most of the US and Canada, many consumers are concerned with their safety of what they are putting in their bodies, and many are under the influence that GMOs are harmful because so many other countries have banned them or require labeling. Genetically Modified Organisms are often confused with hybridization and cross breeding. The differences are GMOs are forced together and include things that are not in nature, while the other two involve two related species being put together. GMOs are more controlled, direct, and specific. Genes are identified, isolated, copied, and introduced into other organisms. The biggest difference between breeding and GMOs would be genetic modification allows genes to transfer between species. GMOs are manipulating DNA, which many believe are harming our bodies; however, humans have been exploiting the creation of new biological variations for centuries, creating many combinations that would never
As much as food is a cultural obsession nowadays in America, food, safety, and public health is something that has not always been a priority within the development as a nation. The Food and Drug Administration, which ensures that the food and drugs we ingest are “safe, wholesome, and sanitary” was only created in 1906 (FDA, 2014) as a byproduct of Upton Sinclair’s book (which was released the same year) “The Jungle”, which had exposed the meat packing industry for misconduct and unhygienic conditions for both workers and the meat being packaged and purchased by consumers. Since then, advances in technology—specifically DNA—has allowed for the development of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). GMOs are living organisms that have had
Genetic Engineering has been around for thousands of years, but testing on increased usage of Genetic Modification may be required to satisfy concerns over how GM crops affect humans and the environment. Some of these concerns include, but are not limited to, potential toxicity, allergenicity, and possible gene transfer to humans or genetic out crossing to other organisms. Yet, crops are grown easier on an unprecedented scale, can have a higher nutritional value, and novel organisms that are resistant to disease are being made available on the market thanks to Genetic Modification. Genetic Modification should not be banned because of the endless opportunities it gives to us despite the insubstantial negative effects it may have on the environment.
The marriage union has evolved from a man and a woman to same sex unions. Additionally, there has been a great increase of police brutality and numerous amounts of black on black crime. Further, they have been many breakthroughs in science, where parents can now select their baby’s gender and eye color. In regards to changes, we can ourselves a disservice to ourselves for instance, some of the ways that Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) caused damages is by altering the natural traits of our foods, negatively affecting our environment and impacting our abilities to function as regular humans.
In the world today, global food security has become a major challenge, and a leading factor is genetically modified organisms. A genetically modified, or engineered, organism is a living thing changed by unnatural material in a lab instead of in a natural setting. A debate over whether or not the production of GMOs should be allowed has blown up because of the many side effects found in recent years. Some believe GMOs cannot be proven harmful, however, the research and studies show otherwise (GMO facts). GMOs affect the environment, animals, and human health in such tortuous and harmful ways. With all the risks involved in the process, the production of GMOs should end.
Genetically modified organisms (GMOs) are highly embedded into our food systems. The use of GMOs is a subject that is often highly debated. GMOs have been viewed as a way to produce food more efficiently, and to aid in the feeding of our ever growing population. However, there are numerous countries that have placed a ban on the use of these products. Comparing production increases in the U.S. to those countries that have banned the use of GMOs will help to give insight into why these products may be a good solution to feeding our ever growing population. At the same time seeing the negative side effects of the history of GMOs may cause you to change your mind on the use of GMOs.
In 1901, a small company named Monsanto made its mark in the chemical industry with the development of saccharine, the popular artificial sweetener. One hundred and thirteen years later, Monsanto is now the world leader in genetically modified organisms (GMOs). With over 1,767 seed and plant patents, they are one of the largest food and agriculture companies in the world (“U.S.”). Monsanto exemplifies the worst type of corporate conglomeration by producing toxic substances, creating questionably safe food products, and monopolizing the farming industry.
When people hear "GMO" not many people know what they are or what they do. GMO stands for is "genetically modified organism", which means that they 're living creature that made from different things inside laboratory for a certain purpose. It 's made from crossbreeding different DNA 's like plants, bacteria and animals with a little bit of chemicals to make what is needed in the world. What 's needed around the world is foods and seeds to produce them. However, these types of foods or seeds might look like the common ones we purchase at the store for daily or weekly bases on the outside, but they aren 't the same inside. The reason why GMOs aren 't same as the regular ones is because unlike the them, foods like corn or broccoli that have an expiration period before they rot or struggle to live before they reach the stores. GMO are able to survive a long time because the DNA that they 're crossbred with it, gives it the ability to survive and adapt to its surroundings so it can be later consumed by the one who purchased it or it 's grown. Although, GMOs can help end world hunger and give the world a larger supply of food, which is a wonderful idea that it can, but it can cause more harm than good. The reason why it can cause more harm than good is because we don 't know what types cause it can do. GMOs are extremely dangerous, but not only to ourselves, but global as well. So to fully understand how GMOs affects on the world, we must see what effects does it do to
Genetically modified organisms are an extremely controversial topic, which has many positive and negative effects. As the population of the world increases, more and more food must be produced to sustain all of life on earth. GMOs have incredible potential to eliminate the issue of hunger worldwide and could possibly provide enough food to sustain the entire globe. Genetically modified Organisms can be plants or animals which contain their own special properties modified by humans, but often have to do with increasing the yield of a food. There are many people who fear that GMOs are harmful and have some unwanted side effects. The pros and cons of using GMOs are vast in their own way. By using them the correct way, we could safely provide
GMO’s or genetically modified organisms are living organisms such as fruits or vegetables whose genetic material has been artificially manipulated through genetic engineering, this often includes inserting genetic material from another organism of a different species. The use of GMO’s is becoming more and more prevalent in the United States although long-term studies of their effects have yet to be done. The production of GMO’s is dangerous, the modifying traits of a specific plant for consumption for the benefit of production and business is unnatural. Although the use of GMO’s has increased production and lowered costs for some foods, the long-term effects are dangerous to not only the consumer but also the environment. Some have even said that “the environmental and health risks outweigh the benefits” (Beckrich).
Over the last two decades, there has been a significant increase in food products containing genetically modified organisms (GMOs). GMOs are substances which have had their genetic material altered through unnatural processes. Since the advent of the first GMO in 1973, the modification of plants and animals through the introduction of a new trait or the alteration of a gene has significantly increased (Aleksejeva 5). With increasing genetic modifications of plants and animals for food products, and the widespread presence of GM foods in the market, consumers are beginning to ask more questions about the health effects of these foods.
Genetically modified (GM) pharmaceuticals are produced through inserting genes of a desired substance into an organism such as plants or animals, so they will express this trait to mass produce that substance in secretions or through their body cells. Many “pharmers”, people who make GM pharmaceuticals, use recombinant DNA techniques to achieve this desired result of having an animal or plant mass produce medicinal substances. Recombining DNA in creating pharmaceutical organisms involves the crossing of the DNA of an organism with a gene that creates the desired substance for a pharmaceutical.