Hamlet
Texts reflect their context and paradigms but transcendental texts that explore aspects of humanity can resonate through time and remain relevant and accessible to audiences. William Shakespeare’s introspective play, Hamlet, explores the complexity of the human condition by reflecting ideologies such as justice, loyalty and morality. Although these deeply human ideas ensure the plays resonance, they are somewhat secondary to the depths of Hamlet’s human struggle. These thematic concerns reflect how flaws in the values of society descend into corruption. Through an exploration of the characterization, Shakespeare invites a re-evaluation of the values that shape human nature. The textual integrity of Hamlet makes it of distinctive
…show more content…
Hamlet sees something that is rotten in his kingdom and he knows it is his moral responsibility to resolve this issues however he finishes off by saying that in actual fact he is powerless “but break my heart, for I must hold my tongue” admitting his weakness. Hamlet begins to grapple with the nature of humanity and morality following the confrontation with the ghost. The appearance of the ghost triggers Hamlet’s existential struggle “All is not well… I doubt some foul play… foul deeds will rise” (Act 1 scene 2) through the use of foreshadowing, Shakespeare exposes the nature of humanity to audiences through the construction of Hamlet’s character. He emphasises that a strong sense of morality can cause conflicts in the decision to make noble choices.
The relevance and significance of the revenge tragedy is in the way it explores human nature and forces audiences to evaluate ideologies such as revenge and justice. The concept of revenge is accompanied by moral conflict and Shakespeare demonstrates that by acting immorally society is likely to be riddled with corruption. Hamlet seeks to avenge the death of his father but struggles with the ramifications of seeking righteous revenge through an immoral act. The imposition of revenge instills the existential questioning on Hamlet as it contradicts his with his social expectation. His
HAMLET is undoubtedly one of the most famous, most arguable yet most enacted tragedies written by William Shakespeare which is a revenge saga. The protagonist is very contradicting in the sense that he is reckless yet cautious, tender yet ferocious, thoughtful yet driven. Hamlet is an insight into the turmoil of emotions which forms the basis of revenge, the psychological dilemma of a bereaved son. Prince Hamlet seeks revenge from his uncle, King Claudius for the ruthless murder of his father and his subsequent marriage to his mother, Queen Gertrude.
Quintessentially speaking, revenge is a thing that many have sought in response to a tragic event unfolding. Typically, as a result, vengeance is contemplated upon by the victim as a means of retribution, a way of making things right and seeking justice on the behest of the victim, if the law will not grant justice through due process due to corrupt forces stemmed deep within it- corrupt seeds of a corrupt plant. Therefore, revenge become an apparent option for those willing to walk that path [of no return]. However, instances of revenge not being attained in the “clear cut” way it is ordinarily acquired have occurred from time to time throughout history. One of the most prominent examples of unconventional revenge attainment can be found within the play Hamlet by William Shakespeare, entailing the revenge path walked by its eponymously named main character, Prince Hamlet. Specifically, his intentful delay in attaining his revenge against his uncle Claudius for his direct role in the death of his father, King Hamlet. This literary conundrum has dumbfounded literary critics for over 400 years and counting- due to the fact that a universally accepted consensus amongst them as well as the general public as to why Hamlet delayed his revenge has not yet been reached.
Justifying the act of revenge is often a difficult thing to do. It is commonly said that two wrongs don’t make a right and committing an act of revenge is very rarely going to end up being a morally good decision. In Shakespeare’s Hamlet, we see many different characters attempting to get revenge and the effects revenge has on them. Further evidence of character’s change due to revenge can be found in Goddard’s contemporary criticism of Hamlet. Finally, in the episode Act V of This American Life, inmates in prison provide a relatable perspective of Shakespeare’s characters and help contextualize their motivations with real experiences. Among the stories of revenge present in the play, Hamlet’s task to kill Claudius causes the most drastic change in his character. We see Hamlet grapple with false madness and his own morals as his life collapses around him. As Hamlet struggles to complete his goal his ideals shift and he is finally able to enact his revenge and kill Claudius. The desire for revenge and the actions towards carrying out that revenge can completely change an individual’s character.
Throughout William Shakespeare’s play, Hamlet, the prince of Denmark experiences a great betrayal of blood and country that causes him to question the very idea of human nature. Trapped between crippling indecision and the massive pressure to avenge his father, Hamlet represents a truly human character whom struggles with the complexities of his own and other’s motivations. In analyzing two soliloquys from act two and four, the total evolution of Hamlet’s character becomes apparent as he finally experiences a schism upon realization that if human nature is inherently rotten and selfish, the ends may as well justify the means, regardless of consequences.
In William Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” many themes, some apparent and some hidden in subtext, are included to assist readers with understanding the famous tragedy. One of the most common is revenge. Shakespeare includes three distinct revenge plots to establish its importance. All three plots are about avenging a dead father and all are directly connected to the protagonist. While these three plots are not of equal importance to the direction of the play, it is important to analyze each to gain insight into their purpose in regards to plot and character development.
“Hamlet” nonetheless shows that revenge is achieved through paying a deadly price. Instead of Hamlet acting out his revenge successfully without losing anything and ending up with a happy ending, Hamlets act of revenge
Undoubtedly, the most essential theme in the development of Hamlet is revenge and question ‘Does revenge pay?’ Revenge is
Revenge is a controversial idea as it can bring the best out of someone, but also the worst. Individuals may take vengeance to deliver justice to those who have been hurt, whereas others have a desire to inflict extreme amount of pain they felt on others to satisfy their actions. Despite if their act of revenge was moral or immoral, each individual feels a sense of justice as they carried out their deed, but sometimes that justice has many consequences. In William Shakespeare’s Hamlet, Hamlet goes through drastic measures to seek vengeance for his father and though he may have served justice to his father, his actions are not justifiable as it has lead to his loss of sanity, the death of many, and others seeking revenge upon him.
While reading Hamlet it is hard to see any theme of humanity, any small trait of what it means to be human. This is a play not filled with joy, laughter, and all that s good, but rather is packed with monstrous deeds and despicable acts. Murder, treachery, madness, and suicide are only some of the recurring themes throughout the play. Yet, as with the Pandora’s box of myth, despite all the evils there is still that small speck of something good, of something human in nature.
The Shakespearean play of Hamlet does have enduring appeal among all audiences regardless of time and culture. This due to the fact that Shakespeare generally tends to display themes in a complex manner and Hamlet is no exception. The main contribution to Hamlet’s Appeal is the fact that the theme of revenge was handled in an effective way. Although multiple forms of media portray a revenge plot, Shakespeare indulges the audience with a revenge plot that is complex and doesn’t revolve around the loss of humanity of the protagonist.
In the face of dissension, one faces an emotional contradiction in resolving the matter: forgive, and progress as a person, or exact revenge, and experience blissful satisfaction. In Shakespeare’s tragedy, Hamlet, he examines the lives of Denmark royalty after the murder of their king at his brother’s hands. The play is wrought with revenge, and begs the eternal struggle of revenge versus forgiveness. Essentially, Hamlet shows forgiveness as being preferable to revenge through the use of situational irony. Every character in Hamlet experiences a wrongdoing at the hands of another, and attempts to avenge themselves, only to induce pain on themselves later on.
It is in the portrait of Hamlet’s melancholy and madness that Shakespeare reveals the philosophical concerns in his play Hamlet that arise from the conflict between Renaissance Humanism and Christian values during the Elizabethan era.
Revenge is one of humanities most intrinsic instincts. In William Shakespeare’s tragedy Hamlet, characters are compelled to restore familial honor by exacting vengeance on those who wronged them. Fortinbras, Laertes, and Hamlet are driven and controlled throughout the play by a need for revenge. It is Hamlet’s inability to commit revenge that gives Shakespeare the time to build Hamlet’s emotional and psychological complexity. Revenge was a deeply fraught topic in Elizabethan culture; it was against the law and considered a sin. However, one could not expect justice. Authorities often did not help commoners. This resulting in a paradox; revenge was both sinful and, in many situations, one’s only mean of
Revenge is considered by many, sought by some, and carried out by few. It consumes the avenger and what is left is madness. The theme of revenge is depicted in many works of literature. Two great examples of this theme would be The Butcher Boy by Patrick McCabe and Hamlet, Prince of Denmark by William Shakespeare. In Shakespeare’s play the character of Hamlet is looking to avenge the murder of his father King Hamlet and in McCabe’s novel the character of Francie Brady seeks for revenge for almost everything that has happened to him, from the death of his mother to the loss of Joe’s friendship. Often the question of whether revenge is justified arises. In Hamlet’s case I see revenge as being justifiable because his motivations are strong,
An enduring theme within Hamlet is the concept of revenge, but elaborating on that idea is how they use revenge as a method of justice. Similarly, within modern society, there are multiple justice system that focuses on this idea of vindictive justice. In contrast, there are justice systems that focus on the idea of reform as opposed to punishment. As a result, vindictive justice systems are created to make the victims feel "satisfied," where as reform justice systems focus on creating long-term solutions. Thus, an underlying message within Hamlet is that vindictive justice does not create actual solutions, as every characters demand for retribution only perpetuates the violence and wrong doings within the play.