Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences
9th Edition
ISBN: 9781305251809
Author: Jay L. Devore
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13.4, Problem 49E
a.
To determine
Test for the model utility.
b.
To determine
Test the hypothesis to conclude whether the interaction predictor should be retained in the model at 5% level of significance.
c.
To determine
Calculate and interpret the 95% confidence interval for the average deflection when shear span ratio is 3 and splitting tensile strength is 6.
d.
To determine
Calculate and interpret the 95% prediction interval for the average deflection by using the values given in part (c).
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
The article "Effect of Granular Subbase Thickness on Airfield Pavement Structural
Response" (K. Gopalakrishnan and M. Thompson, Journal of Materials in Civil
Engineering, 2008:331-342) presents a study of the amount of surface deflection caused by
aircraft landing on an airport runway. A load of 160 kN was applied to a runway surface,
and the amount of deflection in mm (y) was measured at various distances in m (x) from the
point of application. The results are presented in the following table.
y
0.000
3.24
0.305
2.36
0.610
1.42
0.914
0.87
1.219
0.54
1.524
0.34
1.830
0.24
a.
Fit the linear model y = Bo + B1x + ɛ. For each coefficient, test the hypothesis that the
coefficient is equal to 0.
b. Fit the quadratic model y = Bo + Bịx + B2x² + ɛ. For each coefficient, test the hypothesis
that the coefficient is equal to 0.
%3D
Fit the cubic model y = Bo + B1x +
B2x? + B3x + E. For each coefficient, test the
C.
hypothesis that the coefficient is equal to 0.
d.
Which of the models in parts (a)…
The article "Bone Density and Insertion Torque as Predictors of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Fixation Strength"t gave the accompanying data on maximum insertion torque (N• m) and yield load (N), the latter being one
measure of graft strength, for 15 different specimens.
Torque
1.8
2.2
1.9
1.3
2.1
2.2
1.6
2.1
1.2
1.8
2.6
2.5
2.5
1.7
1.6
Load
491
477
598
361
605
671 466
431
384
422
554
577
642
348
446
(a) Is it plausible that yield load is normally distributed?
Yes, there are more than thirty data values.
No, a normal probability plot of yield load is not quite linear.
Yes, a normal probability plot of yield load is quite quadratic.
No, there is not more than thirty data values.
Yes, a normal probability plot of yield load is quite linear.
(b) Estimate true average yield load by calculating a confidence interval with a confidence level of 95%. (Round your answer to two decimal places.)
Interpret the interval.
We are 95% confident that the true population average yield load lies below…
The article "Modeling Resilient Modulus and Temperature Correction for Saudi Roads" (H.
Wahhab, I. Asi, and R. Ramadhan, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2001:298–
305) describes a study designed to predict the resilient modulus of pavement from physical
properties. The following table presents data for the resilient modulus at 40°Cin10® kPa (y),
the surface area of the aggregate in m²/kg (x1), and the softening point of the asphalt in °C
(х).
y
X1
X2
1.48
5.77
60.5
1.70
7.45
74.2
2.03
8.14
67.6
2.86
8.73
70.0
2.43
7.12
64.6
3.06
6.89
65.3
2.44
8.64
66.2
1.29
6.58
64.1
3.53
9.10
68.6
1.04
8.06
58.8
1.88
5.93
63.2
1.90
8.17
62.1
1.76
9.84
68.9
2.82
7.17
72.2
1.00
7.78
54.1
The full quadratic model is y = + P,x, + PzX, + Pz*jXz + Pxx¡ + Bzx; + €. Which
submodel of this full model do you believe is most appropriate? Justify your answer by
fitting two or more models and comparing the results.
Chapter 13 Solutions
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences
Ch. 13.1 - Suppose the variables x = commuting distance and y...Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 2ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 3ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 4ECh. 13.1 - As the air temperature drops, river water becomes...Ch. 13.1 - The accompanying scatterplot is based on data...Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 7ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 8ECh. 13.1 - Consider the following four (x, y) data sets; the...Ch. 13.1 - a. Show that i=1nei=0 when the eis are the...
Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 11ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 12ECh. 13.1 - Prob. 13ECh. 13.1 - If there is at least one x value at which more...Ch. 13.2 - No tortilla chip aficionado likes soggy chips, so...Ch. 13.2 - Polyester fiber ropes are increasingly being used...Ch. 13.2 - The following data on mass rate of burning x and...Ch. 13.2 - Failures in aircraft gas turbine engines due to...Ch. 13.2 - Prob. 19ECh. 13.2 - Prob. 20ECh. 13.2 - Mineral mining is one of the most important...Ch. 13.2 - Prob. 22ECh. 13.2 - Prob. 23ECh. 13.2 - Kyphosis refers to severe forward flexion of the...Ch. 13.2 - Prob. 25ECh. 13.3 - The following data on y 5 glucose concentration...Ch. 13.3 - The viscosity (y) of an oil was measured by a cone...Ch. 13.3 - Prob. 29ECh. 13.3 - The accompanying data was extracted from the...Ch. 13.3 - The accompanying data on y 5 energy output (W) and...Ch. 13.3 - Prob. 32ECh. 13.3 - Prob. 33ECh. 13.3 - The following data resulted from an experiment to...Ch. 13.3 - The article The Respiration in Air and in Water of...Ch. 13.4 - Cardiorespiratory fitness is widely recognized as...Ch. 13.4 - A trucking company considered a multiple...Ch. 13.4 - Let y = wear life of a bearing, x1 = oil...Ch. 13.4 - Let y = sales at a fast-food outlet (1000s of ),...Ch. 13.4 - The article cited in Exercise 49 of Chapter 7 gave...Ch. 13.4 - The article A Study of Factors Affecting the Human...Ch. 13.4 - An investigation of a die-casting process resulted...Ch. 13.4 - Prob. 43ECh. 13.4 - The accompanying Minitab regression output is...Ch. 13.4 - The article Analysis of the Modeling Methodologies...Ch. 13.4 - A regression analysis carried out to relate y =...Ch. 13.4 - Efficient design of certain types of municipal...Ch. 13.4 - An experiment to investigate the effects of a new...Ch. 13.4 - Prob. 49ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 50ECh. 13.4 - The article Optimization of Surface Roughness in...Ch. 13.4 - Utilization of sucrose as a carbon source for the...Ch. 13.4 - Prob. 53ECh. 13.4 - Prob. 54ECh. 13.5 - The article The Influence of Honing Process...Ch. 13.5 - Prob. 56ECh. 13.5 - In the accompanying table, we give the smallest...Ch. 13.5 - Prob. 58ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 59ECh. 13.5 - Pillar stability is a most important factor to...Ch. 13.5 - Prob. 61ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 62ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 63ECh. 13.5 - Prob. 64ECh. 13 - Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock...Ch. 13 - Prob. 66SECh. 13 - The article Validation of the Rockport Fitness...Ch. 13 - Feature recognition from surface models of...Ch. 13 - Air pressure (psi) and temperature (F) were...Ch. 13 - An aeronautical engineering student carried out an...Ch. 13 - An ammonia bath is the one most widely used for...Ch. 13 - The article An Experimental Study of Resistance...Ch. 13 - The accompanying data on x = frequency (MHz) and y...Ch. 13 - Prob. 74SECh. 13 - Prob. 75SECh. 13 - The article Chemithermomechanical Pulp from Mixed...Ch. 13 - Prob. 77SECh. 13 - Prob. 78SECh. 13 - Prob. 79SECh. 13 - Prob. 80SECh. 13 - Prob. 81SECh. 13 - Prob. 82SECh. 13 - Prob. 83SE
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- Wrinkle recovery angle and tensile strength are the two most important characteristics for evaluating the performance of crosslinked cotton fabric. An increase in the degree of crosslinking, as determined by ester carboxyl band absorbance, improves the wrinkle resistance of the fabric (at the expense of reducing mechanical strength). The accompanying data on x = absorbance and y = wrinkle resistance angle was read from a graph in the paper "Predicting the Performance of Durable Press Finished Cotton Fabric with Infrared Spectroscopy".† x 0.115 0.126 0.183 0.246 0.282 0.344 0.355 0.452 0.491 0.554 0.651 y 334 342 355 363 365 372 381 392 400 412 420 Here is regression output from Minitab: Predictor Constant absorb S = 3.60498 Coef 321.878 156.711 SOURCE Regression Residual Error Total SE Coef 2.483 6.464 R-Sq = 98.5% DF 1 9 10 SS 7639.0 117.0 7756.0 T 129.64 24.24 0.000 0.000 R-Sq (adj) = 98.3% MS 7639.0 13.0 F P 587.81 (a) Does the simple linear regression model appear to be…arrow_forwardThe article “Some Parameters of the Population Biology of Spotted Flounder (Ciutharuslinguatula Linnaeus, 1758) in Edremit Bay (North Aegean Sea)” (D. Türker, B. Bayhan, etal., Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Science, 2005:1013–1018) models therelationship between weight W and length L of spotted flounder as W = aLb where a and bare constants to be estimated from data. Transform this equation to produce a linear model.arrow_forwardWrinkle recovery angle and tensile strength are the two most important characteristics for evaluating the performance of crosslinked cotton fabric. An increase in the degree of crosslinking, as determined by ester carboxyl band absorbance, improves the wrinkle resistance of the fabric (at the expense of reducing mechanical strength). The accompanying data on x = absorbance and y = wrinkle resistance angle was read from a graph in the paper "Predicting the Performance of Durable Press Finished Cotton Fabric with Infrared Spectroscopy".t 半 0.115 0.126 0.183 0.246 0.282 0.344 0.355 0.452 0.491 0.554 0.651 334 342 355 363 365 372 381 392 400 412 420 Here is regression output from Minitab: Predictor Coef SE Coef P Constant 321.878 2.483 129.64 0.000 absorb 156.711 6.464 24.24 0.000 S = 3.60498 R-Sq = 98.5% R-Są (adj) - 98.3% SOURCE DF MS F P Regression 1 7639.0 7639.0 587.81 0.000 Residual Error 9 117.0 13.0 Total 10 7756.0 (a) Does the simple linear regression model appear to be…arrow_forward
- Wrinkle recovery angle and tensile strength are the two most important characteristics for evaluating the performance of crosslinked cotton fabric. An increase in the degree of crosslinking, as determined by ester carboxyl band absorbance, improves the wrinkle resistance of the fabric (at the expense of reducing mechanical strength). The accompanying data on x = absorbance and y = wrinkle resistance angle was read from a graph in the paper "Predicting the Performance of Durable Press Finished Cotton Fabric with Infrared Spectroscopy".t x 0.115 0.126 0.183 0.246 0.282 0.344 0.355 0.452 0.491 0.554 0.651 y 334 342 355 363 365 372 381 400 392 412 420 Here is regression output from Minitab: Predictor Constant absorb S = 3.60498 Coef 321.878 156.711 SOURCE Regression Residual Error Total R-Sq= 98.5% DF SE Coef 2.483 6.464 1 9 10 SS 7639.0 117.0 7756..0 T 129.64 24.24 P 0.000 0.000. R-Sq (adj) 98.3% MS 7639.0 13.0 F 587.81 (a) Does the simple linear regression model appear to be appropriate?…arrow_forwardThe article "Experimental Measurement of Radiative Heat Transfer in Gas-Solid Suspension Flow System" (G. Han, K. Tuzla, and J. Chen, AIChe Journal, 2002:1910- 1916) discusses the calibration of a radiometer. Several measurements were made on the electromotive force readings of the radiometer (in volts) and the radiation flux (in kilowatts per square meter). The results (read from a graph) are presented in the following table. Heat flux (y) 15 31 51 55 67 89 Signal output (x) 1.08 2.42 4.17 4.46 5.17 6.92 Compute the least-squares line for predicting heat flux from the signal output. If the radiometer reads 3.00 V, predict the heat flux. If the radiometer reads 8.00 V, should the heat flux be predicted? If so, predict it. If not, explain why. C.arrow_forwardRecently there has been increased use of stainless steel claddings in industrial settings. Claddings are used to finish the exterior walls of a building and help weatherproof the structure. To ensure the quality of claddings, it is essential to know how welding parameters impact the cladding process. The authors of “Mathematical Modeling of Weld Bead Geometry, Quality, and Productivity for Stainless Steel Claddings Deposited by FCAW” (J. Mater. Engr. Perform., 2012: 1862–1872) in vestigated how y 5 deposition rate was influenced by x1 = feed rate (Wf , in m/min) and x2 = welding speed (S, in cm/min). The following 22 observations correspond to the experiment condition where applied voltage was less than 30v: y: 2.718 3.881 2.773 3.924 2.740 3.870 x1 : 17.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 7.0 10.0 x 2 : 30 30 50 50 30 30 y: 2.847 3.901 2.204 4.454 3.324 3.319 x1 : 7.0 10.0 5.5 11.5 8.5 8.5 x2 : 50 50 40 40 40 20 The whole data and Question parts are attachedarrow_forward
- The article “Effect of Granular Subbase Thickness on Airfield Pavement Structural Response” (K. Gopalakrishnan and M. Thompson, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2008:331–342) presents a study of the effect of the subbase thickness on the amount of surface deflection caused by aircraft landing on an airport runway. In six applications of a 160 kN load on a runway with a subbase thickness of 864 mm, the average surface deflection was 2.03 mm with a standard deviation of 0.090 mm. Find a 90% confidence interval for the mean deflection caused by a 160 kN load.arrow_forwardEXAMPLE 8.5 | Alloy Adhesion An article in the Journal of Materials Engineering ["Instrumented Tensile Adhesion Tests on Plasma Sprayed Thermal Barrier Coatings" (1989, Vol. 11(4), pp. 275-282)] describes the results of tensile adhesion tests on 22 U-700 alloy specimens. The load at specimen failure is as follows (in megapascals): 19.8 15.4 11.4 19.5 10.1 18.5 14.1 8.8 14.9 7.9 17.6 13.6 O 0.01 O 0.025 O 0.05 O 0.95 O 0.975 7.5 12.7 16.7 11.9 15.4 11.9 15.8 11.4 The sample mean is x = 13.71, and the sample standard deviation is s = 3.55. Figures 8.6 and 8.7 show a box plot and a normal probability plot of the tensile adhesion test data, respectively. These displays provide good support for the assumption that the population is normally distributed. We want to find a 95% CI on μ. Since n = 22, we have n - 1 = 21 degrees of freedom for t, so to.025,21 = 2.080. The resulting CI is X-1/2-1/√x+1a/2n-1³/√n 13.71-2.080 (3.55)/√/22 ≤ ≤ 13.71 +2.080 (3.55)/√22 13.711.57 ≤ ≤ 13.71 +1.57 12.14 ≤…arrow_forwardThe dynamic modulus of concrete is obtained for two different concrete mixes. For the first mix, n1 = 33, ī = 115.1 and s1 = 0.47 psi. For the second mix, n2 = 31, y = 114.6 and s2 = 0.38. (a) Test, with a = 0.05, the null hypothesis of equality of mean dynamic modulus versus the two-sided alternative. (b) Obtain a 95% confidence interval for the difference in mean dynamic modulus.arrow_forward
- Adding glass particles to clay brick may improve the structural properties of the brick. The article "Effects of Waste Glass Additions on the Properties and Durability of Fired Clay Brick" (S. Chidiac and L. Federico, Can J Civ Eng, 2007:1458–1466) describes experiments in which the compressive strength (in MPa) was measured for bricks with varying amounts of glass content and glass particle size. The results in the following table are consistent with means and standard deviations presented in the article. Glass Content (%) Strength (MPa) Size 5 Coarse 78.7 70.8 78.6 81.7 79.2 5 Fine 73.0 90.1 71.4 93.8 82.7 10 Coarse 80.1 76.9 76.5 84.3 77.7 10 Fine 76.2 80.1 121.2 81.4 61.2 15 Coarse 90.3 95.8 103.1 99.5 73.3 15 Fine 141.1 144.1 122.4 134.5 124.9 a. Estimate all main effects and interactions. b. Construct an ANOVA table. You may give ranges for the P-values. Is the additive model plausible? Provide the value of a test statistic and the P-value. Can the effect of glass content on…arrow_forwardIn rock blasting, the peak particle velocity (PPV) depends both on the distance from the blast and on the amount of charge. The article "Prediction of Particle Velocity Caused by Blasting for an Infrastructure Excavation Covering Granite Bedrock" (A. Kahriman, Mineral Resources Engineering, 2001:205-218) presents data on PPV, scaled distance (which is equal to the distance divided by the square root of the charge), and the amount of charge. The following table presents the values of PPV, scaled distance, and amount of charge for 15 blasts. Scaled Distance (m/kg0.5) PPV Amount of Charge (mm/s) (kg) 1.4 47.33 4.2 15.7 9.6 92.0 2.54 15.8 40.0 1.14 24.3 48.7 0.889 23.0 95.7 1.65 12.7 67.7 1.4 39.3 13.0 26.8 8.0 70.0 1.02 29.94 13.5 4.57 10.9 41.0 6.6 8.63 108.8 1.02 28.64 27.43 3.94 18.21 59.1 1.4 33.0 11.5 1.4 34.0 175.0 Fit the model In PPV = Bo + B1 In Scaled Distance + B2 In Charge + E. Compute the P- value for testing Ho : B¡ = 0 for Bo. B1, and Bz. b. The article claims that the…arrow_forward67. The accompanying summary data on compression strength (Ib) for 12 × 10 x 8 in. boxes appeared in the article "Compression of Single-Wall Corrugated Shipping Containers Using Fixed and Floating Test Platens" (J. Testing and Evaluation, 1992: 318–320). The authors stated that "the difference between the compression strength using fixed and floating platen method was found to be small compared to normal variation in compression strength between identical boxes." Do you agree? Is your analysis predicated on any assumptions? Sample Size Sample Mean Sample SD Method Fixed 10 807 27 Floating 10 757 41arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- MATLAB: An Introduction with ApplicationsStatisticsISBN:9781119256830Author:Amos GilatPublisher:John Wiley & Sons IncProbability and Statistics for Engineering and th...StatisticsISBN:9781305251809Author:Jay L. DevorePublisher:Cengage LearningStatistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...StatisticsISBN:9781305504912Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. WallnauPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...StatisticsISBN:9780134683416Author:Ron Larson, Betsy FarberPublisher:PEARSONThe Basic Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319042578Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. FlignerPublisher:W. H. FreemanIntroduction to the Practice of StatisticsStatisticsISBN:9781319013387Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. CraigPublisher:W. H. Freeman
MATLAB: An Introduction with Applications
Statistics
ISBN:9781119256830
Author:Amos Gilat
Publisher:John Wiley & Sons Inc
Probability and Statistics for Engineering and th...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305251809
Author:Jay L. Devore
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Statistics for The Behavioral Sciences (MindTap C...
Statistics
ISBN:9781305504912
Author:Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Elementary Statistics: Picturing the World (7th E...
Statistics
ISBN:9780134683416
Author:Ron Larson, Betsy Farber
Publisher:PEARSON
The Basic Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319042578
Author:David S. Moore, William I. Notz, Michael A. Fligner
Publisher:W. H. Freeman
Introduction to the Practice of Statistics
Statistics
ISBN:9781319013387
Author:David S. Moore, George P. McCabe, Bruce A. Craig
Publisher:W. H. Freeman
Hypothesis Testing using Confidence Interval Approach; Author: BUM2413 Applied Statistics UMP;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hq1l3e9pLyY;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY
Hypothesis Testing - Difference of Two Means - Student's -Distribution & Normal Distribution; Author: The Organic Chemistry Tutor;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcZwyzwWU7o;License: Standard Youtube License