Introduction to mathematical programming
4th Edition
ISBN: 9780534359645
Author: Jeffrey B. Goldberg
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Concept explainers
Expert Solution & Answer
Chapter 3.3, Problem 9P
Explanation of Solution
Identifying the case that applies the following LPs:
Mathematical model of given LP is,
Subject to the constraints,
Plot the graph:
The graph is plotted by treating them as linear equations and the graph for the given linear program is shown
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Solve the following LP optimization problem using the simplex method: maximize 40x + 30 subject to x + y <= 12, 2x + y <= 16 x >= 1 , y >= 0
b) Consider the following linear programming problem:
Min z = x1 + x2
s.t. 3x1 – 2x2 < 5
X1 + x2 < 3
3x1 + 3x2 2 9
X1, X2 2 0
Using the graphical approach, determine the possible optimal solution(s) and comment
on the special case involved, if any.
determine the optimal
value of X1 and X2 that
maximize value Z.
Max Z = 5X1 + 2X2
St. X1 + X2 = 0
Chapter 3 Solutions
Introduction to mathematical programming
Ch. 3.1 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.1 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.2 - Prob. 5P
Ch. 3.2 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.3 - Prob. 10PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.4 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.5 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.6 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.7 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 10PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 11PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 12PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 13PCh. 3.8 - Prob. 14PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 10PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 11PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 12PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 13PCh. 3.9 - Prob. 14PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 5PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 6PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.10 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 1PCh. 3.11 - Show that Fincos objective function may also be...Ch. 3.11 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 4PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 7PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 8PCh. 3.11 - Prob. 9PCh. 3.12 - Prob. 2PCh. 3.12 - Prob. 3PCh. 3.12 - Prob. 4PCh. 3 - Prob. 1RPCh. 3 - Prob. 2RPCh. 3 - Prob. 3RPCh. 3 - Prob. 4RPCh. 3 - Prob. 5RPCh. 3 - Prob. 6RPCh. 3 - Prob. 7RPCh. 3 - Prob. 8RPCh. 3 - Prob. 9RPCh. 3 - Prob. 10RPCh. 3 - Prob. 11RPCh. 3 - Prob. 12RPCh. 3 - Prob. 13RPCh. 3 - Prob. 14RPCh. 3 - Prob. 15RPCh. 3 - Prob. 16RPCh. 3 - Prob. 17RPCh. 3 - Prob. 18RPCh. 3 - Prob. 19RPCh. 3 - Prob. 20RPCh. 3 - Prob. 21RPCh. 3 - Prob. 22RPCh. 3 - Prob. 23RPCh. 3 - Prob. 24RPCh. 3 - Prob. 25RPCh. 3 - Prob. 26RPCh. 3 - Prob. 27RPCh. 3 - Prob. 28RPCh. 3 - Prob. 29RPCh. 3 - Prob. 30RPCh. 3 - Prob. 31RPCh. 3 - Prob. 32RPCh. 3 - Prob. 33RPCh. 3 - Prob. 34RPCh. 3 - Prob. 35RPCh. 3 - Prob. 36RPCh. 3 - Prob. 37RPCh. 3 - Prob. 38RPCh. 3 - Prob. 39RPCh. 3 - Prob. 40RPCh. 3 - Prob. 41RPCh. 3 - Prob. 42RPCh. 3 - Prob. 43RPCh. 3 - Prob. 44RPCh. 3 - Prob. 45RPCh. 3 - Prob. 46RPCh. 3 - Prob. 47RPCh. 3 - Prob. 48RPCh. 3 - Prob. 49RPCh. 3 - Prob. 50RPCh. 3 - Prob. 51RPCh. 3 - Prob. 52RPCh. 3 - Prob. 53RPCh. 3 - Prob. 54RPCh. 3 - Prob. 56RPCh. 3 - Prob. 57RPCh. 3 - Prob. 58RPCh. 3 - Prob. 59RPCh. 3 - Prob. 60RPCh. 3 - Prob. 61RPCh. 3 - Prob. 62RPCh. 3 - Prob. 63RP
Knowledge Booster
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, computer-science and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.Similar questions
- 9. Recall the TJ Inc.'s problem (Chapter 2, Problem 28). Letting W = jars of Western Foods Salsa M = jars of Mexico City Salsa leads to the formulation: Max 1W + 1.25M s.t. 5W + 7M 0arrow_forwardVariable Cells Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease Туре А 4 -3.5 1E+30 Туре B y Туре С 3. 6. 2 Constraints Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease Hours 1. 15 1 15 12 8. Plastic 20 30 1E+30 30 Cotton 70 70 40 55 Calculate the optimal value of the objective function if the coefficient of "x" changes to 4 and the coefficient of "y" changes to 3.5. Hint: Since it is proposing a simultaneous change (more than one change at a time), we have to check the 100% rule. **Enter the number only** **Do not use any words or symbols** Answer: 5 M 5arrow_forwardSolve the following graphically: Max z = 3x1 + 4x2 subject to x1 + 2x2 ≤ 16 2x1 + 3x2 ≤ 18 x1 ≥ 2 x2 ≤ 10 x1, x2 ≥ 0 What are the optimal values of x1, x2, and z? Group of answer choices x1 = 93, x2 = 0, z = 48 x1 = 19, x2 = 0, z = 32 x1 = 10, x2 = 0, z = 27 x1 = 9, x2 = 0, z = 27 x1 = 9, x2 = 3, z = 30 x1 = 12, x2 = 6, z = 42arrow_forward
- Given the objective function 2x1+5x2 that needs to be maximized and the graphical solution shown below, what is the optimal value of the objective function? 420 20 [ [8] Answer: 45arrow_forwarduses the python program 1- Sketching the optimal level set of the objective function and find optimal value 1) using ploting objective function contours and also 2) checking vertex points. maximize subject to (Hint: optimal value = 42) 2x + 3y -3x + y ==0 1:06 ص //arrow_forwardIf 142 and 155 are two feasible solutions for a primal minimization problem, whereas 122 and 130 are two feasible solutions for the associated dual maximization problem. Which of the following statements is the most correct? 122 <= Optimal solution <= 155 O b. 122 <= Optimal solution <= 142 D DC 130 <= Optimal solution <= 142 Od 130 <= Optimal solution <= 155arrow_forward
- Linear Programming Model: Subject to: 2. Linear Programming Model: Subject to: Minimize Cost = 50,000X + 75,000Y The optimal solution is X = 2 hectares of kamagong and Y =2 hectares of narra, with a minimum cost of P200,000. X ≥ 30,000 10X + 30Y ≥ 60 X ≤ 10,000 5X + 10Y ≥ 25 6X + 3Y ≥ 12 Maximize Income = 0.035(50,000 - X) + 0.045X X,Y ≥ 0 The optimal solution is X = 30,000, with a maximum monthly income of P1,650. ARE NUMBERS 1 & 2 CORRECT? SHOW THE GRAPH WITH LABELS AND SOLVE BOTHarrow_forwardQuestion 31 An optimal solution is only optimal with respect to a particular mathematical model that provides only a representation of the actual problem. O True O Falsearrow_forwardIt is unclear why each LP has an optimal fundamental feasible solution.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Operations Research : Applications and AlgorithmsComputer ScienceISBN:9780534380588Author:Wayne L. WinstonPublisher:Brooks Cole
Operations Research : Applications and Algorithms
Computer Science
ISBN:9780534380588
Author:Wayne L. Winston
Publisher:Brooks Cole