To what extent do audiences need art galleries to view art works?
Art galleries are essential to the art world, however, is not the only source for audiences to view art. To begin with, art and artwork is defined as the application of human skill, creativity and imagination. Taking this into consideration, individuals need to examine the nature and purpose of art galleries as a facility to collaborate, organize and display a collection of artworks. As art however, is any expression of human creativity, its presence is not bound to art galleries and is evidently present in the world around us be it in photographs, the internet or even in graffiti.
To determine the extent audiences need art galleries to view art, the purpose of
…show more content…
As art is a dynamic expression of ones creativity, art can be expressed and viewed everywhere and are not confined to art galleries.
A perfect example of the presence of artworks available for viewing is in graffiti. Graffiti is often a derogative term used to describe writing, drawing, or images placed on the surfaces of public buildings or areas. Although not considered fine art by many, as an expression of creativity and imagination, it falls under the category of artworks. What separates this form of artwork from those found in galleries is the atmosphere and environment that is attached to graffiti that cannot be replicated or found in art galleries. The raw nature of graffiti makes it appealing for viewers, however, the fact it is abundant in the urban environment justifies the idea that it can be viewed without the need for an art gallery.
An example of an artist who’s work is only present in the urban environment is a Melbourne graffiti artist under the alias of Aeon. Examples of his artworks are “Black” (undated) and “Foes” (undated), both of which are considered “Pieces” produced with spray paint on a bricked surface. Such pieces are only available for viewing on the streets of Melbourne on back lanes and ally ways. The location of his works add to the effect and subjective nature of his works with the emphasis of art flourishing in all areas of the world and by
According to Boyd, through Graffiti is essential to understand as a form of art that crosses the boundaries of location, method, and motivation. He acknowledges that graffiti might include “racist remarks, empty slogans and illegal signatures.”(Boyd 251) Boyd’s piece is also very informative because according to the author, there are two methods for creating this form of art: murals and tagging. The most popular one is tagging because it can be found almost everywhere from fence posts to trains, street walls to buses. The main goal of graffiti writers is to put their signature tags in places to be recognized by their
The cutting edge of the public art development, connected with the hip-hop society of breakdancing and rap music, began with African-American and Latino teenagers in Philadelphia and New York in the late 1960s (MacDonald 1). At that time graffiti to most, was considered to be a form of art work. Regardless of those that thought of it as art, there were and are still numerous individuals that loathe the graffiti movement. Works of art have been dependably charming for ages, as it is a method for self-expression and inventiveness. Artistic expressions have advanced in many ways, such as public canvases offering an approach to modern day unique artwork. Graffiti is progressively turning into a hobby. Although one of the major controversies of graffiti surround the statement that it is not art and considered vandalism, graffiti allow artists to display grateful meanings, skills and expressions to the public.
Art is a very broad topic. The “art” in something called ArtPrize is viewed by regular everyday citizens and visitors of Grand Rapids, Mi. It was a social experiment,
As stated above, public art is very convoluted and ever-expanding, especially in our contemporary world. Cartier, acknowledges the hardship of putting art in boxes due to the sheer diversity and approaches to works, stating that one can find “permanent works, temporary works, political activism, service art, performance, earthworks, community projects...etc”.3 Do these account for public art, or art in general? Rosalind Krauss, aware of the
Graffiti is a excellent way to let out creativity, with a meaning everyone can relate to. For example, “Graffiti can turn a boring old brick wall into a piece of art as a result; graffiti can decorate a community in some peoples’ eyes “ (Cost of Graffiti on Communities). Artists use their imaginations to recreate a dull scene into something amazing. In addition,
Defining public art is iPublic art in the eyes of our group is anything that is not within the walls of someone's house. It is especially unique in that anyone walking down the street has access to it and can draw impact from it. Public art is accessible to the masses and encourages residents to get involved in the neighborhood. The definition of public art has expanded over the years. It can be things like graffiti or statues on the street as well as videos or pictures posted on the internet. Public art can range from being temporary and interactive to a symbol of a community that will stand for generations. Another aspect of public art is that it is something that people are subject to see, even if they do not necessarily want to. Public
The presence of graffiti in art galleries shows this. “[G]raffiti art has been shown in various galleries in New York and London, and artists are often commissioned to do legal murals and other work for art shows” ("Graffiti: Art Through Vandalism”). Graffiti artists demonstrate their skill through various pieces to receive attention from those who can hire them. In order to be recognized by the public, these artists must master the use of spray paint. This is difficult because it can not be erased or removed and the artist must work their mistakes into the piece. It takes time for graffiti artists to improve because “[a]s in any art form, authority of creative expression develops through committed practice and thought” (Grody 7). Grody describes the commitment that is necessary in graffiti art. Graffiti artists often plan out their pieces and think through their ideas before beginning the process of painting. They must quickly and carefully execute their art to avoid being noticed. It takes time to acquire such a precise skill. It is important to recognize the skill that graffiti requires to be
This essay discusses whether we should accept graffiti as an art form or if it classes as vandalism, or if there is indeed a distinction between the two. I have decided to address this issue as I have been and am currently exploring graffiti visually in my project. Graffiti is sometimes regarded as an art form by those doing it or who observe it, yet some may see graffiti as a nuisance, and it is frequently associated with anti-social behaviour and gang culture. It is also expensive to remove, estimated in the UK at more than £1billion to remove unwanted graffiti. Therefore, there seems to be a lot of stigma around what graffiti should be classed as and in my essay, I want to explore why graffiti is can always a bad thing, and overall express my opinion of how to a certain extent graffiti can be classed as art. This is demonstrated through identifying and analysing different types of graffiti including tagging, and street art.
Graffiti is an art that is unauthorized. Graffiti’s existence may parallel the origins of human existence, as cave drawing can be traced back to the earliest known communication. Modern graffiti can be traced to urban areas in the northeastern United States. During the 1960s and 70s, graffiti became a method by which youth in Northeastern part of US left their marks or identification around their neighborhoods. The process of leaving one’s
Unsurprisingly, there are arguments against the medium of graffiti. Since it is an unsanctioned practice, there are anxieties surrounding the fact that there is a single decision maker compared to art institutions and commissioned public art. Both include “numerous
Structures that stretch high above of the hustle and bustle of cars and people on the ground level, going through any big city numerous attractions can steal your attention away. There’s so much to absorb some things will never be noticed. Walls of buildings and sides of train cars are rarely acknowledged with all the advertising, architecture, and of course the “tagging.” An average person would consider the widespread art form of graffiti an eyesore, but others would disagree. Who's to say what is art as opposed to trash vandalism? Since the late 60’s people have hit the streets, cans of paint in hand, to scrawl their wildest dreams onto whatever “canvas” they could find. Philadelphia high school student Cornbread is credited with starting this movement in 1967 in attempts to get the attention of a girl he fancied (The History Of American Graffiti). Others took notice and began to search for any surface they could post up a “piece.” Graffiti is stereotypically defined to be strictly in a public place or be illegal. Opposite to that there are legal graffiti locations such as 5 Pointz in Queens or street museums such as Bushwick Collective in Brooklyn run by Joe Ficalora where people are allowed to paint as they please free from repercussions (Kennedy, Graffiti Art of the City, From the Bronx to Brooklyn). Additionally, since it’s expansion, in the 80s galleries began to showcase this “vandalism” as artworks. Curators and collectors even began to hire artists to create
Some graffiti are relevant to the indelicacy or have no meaning which make people feel irksome and also have a bad effect on the appearance of a city. There are two debates of graffiti----street art and vandalism, which means it should be distinguished between two forms of graffiti. For example, it should not be connected between the graffiti of Banksy, who is an English-based graffiti artist and the people who draw some indelicate words or painting on the public place(Figure 1 and figure 2). Everyone can judge these two which is street art because the intentions are different. The latter is just draw some offensive graffiti and have no meaning or intention(Miller, 2014). Finding a suitable place is also an essential point. If a good graffiti in a unsuitable place, it is also a vandalism. The reason is that a city
Graffiti is more and more widely known and considered art. First of all, what is the definition of art? Aristotle (300s B.C.E), a famous Greek philosopher, acknowledged that art is “the realization in external form of a true idea, and is traced back to that natural love of imitation, which
Whether it’s in a positive or negative way, it is clear that graffiti has a large impact on today’s society. However, the majority of people have little to no knowledge about this emerging art form that surrounds them. Graffiti comes in a multitude of different styles and formats, from the quotes and numbers that constantly pop up inside bathroom stalls and on school desks to works of art that encompass entire buildings. This essay provides a concise overview of the prominent categories of graffiti: tags, stencil, wildstyle, blockbusters, heaven, and pieces.
In modern societies, there are ongoing debates among multiple stakeholders regarding the nature and acceptability of graffiti as a sustainable and decent art form. Having gained immense popularity in urban environments, graffiti has always been on the verge between art and vandalism. The reason for such controversial perceptions lies in the definition of graffiti and its origins. As Campos defines it, “graffiti and street art could be considered a practice through which individuals appropriate the city” and whose nature “is consistently described as subversive” (Campos, 2015, p. 17) and illicit. That is, the subculture of graffiti implies the element of illicit artistic expression placed in public view. While the original purpose of graffiti – as the practice was born in Philadelphia of the 1960s – was tagging through specific styles of writing and lettering, further development of the culture (Mettler, 2012, p. 252). At the same time, development of graffiti form lettering focused on the writer’s name to more elaborate forms including imagery and – as street art – making it the focus have raised even more debate regarding graffiti. This essay will argue that graffiti is a decent form of visual art involving skills, artistic vision and sociocultural context: that is, not all graffiti works are vandalism, for many of them occupy public spaces with the purpose of decoration or communication of socially significant messages. As an example, the graffiti created by Futura