Compare And Contrast Classical Empires

Han Dynasty and Roman Empire have many cultural aspects including religious, geographical, and political similarities that can be compared, though many differences are also widespread during this era. Though Roman and Han political structures, both emphasized bureaucracies, they came to them quite differently. Through many amounts of expansion, both societies spread culture and earned money, though expansion was eventually their downfall. Their religions differed greatly, with Rome, emphasizing polytheism and Han China focusing on Confucianism. The differences and similarities between these two civilizations are to be discussed in this essay. One might ask, Which civilization yielded the best

Empires on their outside may seem very different and unique. However, when you get down to their fundamentals, you begin to truly realize how similar they are. Just as the imposing pine tree and humble tomato plant may seem vastly different, their start from a lowly seed and craving for water and sunlight to survive unifies them. Such is also true with the Han and Roman empires. While key differences may be present, their social structures, influencing religions, and causes of collapse unify them.

In the distance across the land was four civilizations. These civilizations were known as the Akkadians, the Babylonians, the Assyrians and finally the Neo-Babylonians. All of the civilizations that lived in mesopotamia rose and fell like the sun.

The Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire both had a great influence not only on its people but the world as a whole. The two had similar and different methods of political control. Both ruled their people under a bureaucracy, they had civil servants to maintain their large empires, and their foundations were made of great and strong rulers. Aside from the similarities they also had several differences. Take China for example, they focused more on Confucianism and they had a Mandate of Heaven. Rome on the other hand used entertainment to distract and control the masses of its population.

Both Rome and Han China equivalently constructed similar roads, bridges, and water development systems all to strengthen their economy. Verifications of this can be seen when Rome fully realized the potential of arches and bridges in their road systems that spanned more than 400,000 km of roads that were used for trade. Correspondingly, they also built aqueducts as a form of water engineering to constantly bring in a flow of water to the cities and towns. Similarly, Han China built massive fortified roadways for trade and walls for fortification comparable to the Great Wall of China as a means of defense. Also in comparison to Roman aqueducts, Han China built water canals as means to direct water as they pleased. These similarities defined their engineering skills as these inventions and constructions were used to help strengthen their economies. Rome built and constructed roads to aid their trade systems and make easier routes of travel. Furthermore, they used aqueducts to get water into the city saving money and the need for human labor. Similarly, Han China used their fortified roads to trade much easier and as a means of safer travel. This went hand in hand with China’s water canals that also aided their economy by directing water where needed saving much money and limiting the need for human labor as well.

Han dynasty emerged into power back in 221BCE after the fall of Qin dynasty 206BCE. They were the original pioneers when it comes to political systems and structure of the society that lasted more than 2000 years in China. On the other hand, the Roman Empire controlled the western Mediterranean and they had various advancements in technology and science. The Romans had different engineering accomplishments considered to be different from those of the Han kingdom. They formed the basis of the establishment of the western legal codes. This research is aimed towards analysis the similarities and the differences between the Han dynasty and the Roman Empire. The consequences of their differences are also analyzed in this research.

The Roman empire and the Persian empire were both world powers for a reason. Both empires used very similar and different strategies to achieve all the power they accumulated over time. They both had very different views on everything from religion to human rights. Both empires both grew around the general same area, the Mediterranean Sea. They both used massive military force when conquering other empires and lands.

Classical Chinese Empires and the Roman Empire were both a big political power in their times. Chinese governments had a centralized government, same with the Roman’s. Both empires were very scared of their dynasties spreading out. This happened to the Greek-City State Athens, they were very decentralized and Athens spread out to make new villages. This caused Athens to eventually fall because they couldn’t take the power of the Roman Empire. Both were very successful and they accomplished many great achievements with the many leaders they both had. Innovation similarities were very similar as well because both empires invented and carried

Comparative Essay Two classical civilizations, the Han dynasty and Imperial Rome, both demonstrated evident methods of political control. Although the Han Dynasty demonstrated political control through the means of a bureaucracy and Confucianism, Imperial Rome portrayed political control through an aristocracy and a polytheistic religion. In spite of their differences, these two civilizations shared characteristics of political control, including the use of pre-existing class structures and the ruling of the empire by a single leader. To begin with, the Han dynasty had a single emperor and a group of bureaucrats. The bureaucrats served to advise the empire and played a key role in running the empire through executive privileges.

Rome and Han China had a lot in common ,but at the same token they had a lot of differences. Some similarities were that they both where very advanced during their time and they both also controlled a large portion of the world during peak. One difference is

Both Imperial Rome and Han China focused profoundly on territorial expansion. The reasoning behind so was due to the threats both empires security and stability faced which led to the need of conquest to consume their threats rather than directly solve their issues, which led to more threats causing a constant expansion of these empires. Although the constant conquest did lead to more threats the empires gave inflation to many new military methods, allowing a more broad hand the government had and could use to their advantage in various situations both inside and outside their empires. The increased military coercion and taxation both empires had also created a new political aspect they shared. Imperial Rome and Han China shared similar interest in civil service building projects. The civil service building projects were encouraged due to political threats both these Eurasian empires face but also encourage economic growth. Imperial Rome and Han China’s creation of roads within and along the boundaries of their empires developed easy communication links, heightened and supported economic activity, and made easier the coercion of the military. imperial Rome and shared political structures that made these distant empires quite similar politically

Its street lay out is a checkboard pattern with roads palaces and temples scatterred throughout

Han China and Imperial Rome were very similar in the ways they had their social classes configured, the power the emperors had to govern, and what technological advances they made. Both empires had certain social classes that set a citizen's place in society. Each empire had an ‘upper class’ to help the

The Roman and Han empires thrived for hundreds of years, making huge impacts on society and the way of life in classical civilizations. Both had many products to trade, had a strong bureaucracy, and created many advanced technologies that helped shape our world today. Yet some of these impacts on society played a major role in the demise of these two major empires. While the Han and Roman empires had many similarities that led to their decline, such as corrupt government officials and invasions by foreign groups, they also had key differences, such as the way the empire dealt with its immense amount of land and the level of assimilation of those they conquered.

From the beginning of time to present day rulers from all walks of life have always wanted and tried to leave their personal touches on society. From Qin Shi Huangdi of China as far over to Augustus Caesar of Rome, they all wanted people to recognize, respect and remember them until long after their time. These two rulers in particular left their mark by erecting pillars of greatness and importance to history. Qin Shi Huangdi and Augustus Caesar made claims of events and how successful they were at what they accomplished in their time of power. Some of these are history and some are legends. Each of these rulers used military victories, made new code laws, and established a sense of unity throughout their land. From these stories told throughout time we can see similarities of common characteristics and differences of distinct aspects between the two empires.